David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):51-63 (2008)
Prominent ethical and policy issues such as affirmative action and female enrollment in science and engineering revolve around the idea that diversity is good. However, a precise definition is seldom provided. I show that diversity may be construed as a factual description, a craving for symmetry, an intrinsic good, an instrumental good, a symptom, or a side effect. These acceptions differ vastly in their nature and properties. Some are deeply mistaken and some others cannot lead to concrete policies. It is thus necessary to clarify what one means by ‘diversity.’ It may be a neutral description of a given state; but this is insufficient to act. The idea that there should be the same representation in a specific context as in the overall population is both puzzling and arbitrary. Diversity as intrinsic good is a mere opinion, which cannot be concretely applied; moreover, the most commonly invoked forms of diversity (sexual and racial) are not intrinsically good. On the other hand, diversity as instrumental good can be evaluated empirically and can give rise to policies, but these may be very weak. Finally, symptoms and side effects are not actually about diversity. I consider the example of female enrollment in science and engineering, interpreting the various arguments found in the literature in light of this polysemy.
|Keywords||Affirmative action Ethics Female students Higher education Minority students Philosophy Policy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph LeFevre (2003). The Value of Diversity: A Justification of Affirmative Action. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):125–133.
Stephen Maitzen* (1997). Diversity in the Classroom. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (3):293-302.
John Stuart Mill (1962). Utilitarianism. Cleveland, World Pub. Co..
G. E. Moore (1903/2004). Principia Ethica. Dover Publications.
Nicola Pless & Thomas Maak (2004). Building an Inclusive Diversity Culture: Principles, Processes and Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 54 (2):129 - 147.
Citations of this work BETA
Daryl E. Chubin (2009). Underrepresentation in the Real World. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):7-10.
Similar books and articles
I. Kalin (2011). Religion, Unity and Diversity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (4):471-478.
Karyn L. Freedman (2009). Diversity and the Fate of Objectivity. Social Epistemology 23 (1):45-56.
James Bohman (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity. Episteme 3 (3):175-191.
H. Tristram Engelhardt (1999). Bioethics in the Third Millennium: Some Critical Anticipations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):225-243.
Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (2004). Prankster's Ethics. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):45–52.
Chandran Kukathas (2002). Equality and Diversity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):185-212.
Charles Hampden-Turner & Ginger Chih (2011). Dilemmas Of Diversity: A New Paradigm of Integrating Diversity. World Futures 66 (3):192-218.
Charles Hampden-Turner & Ginger Chih (2010). Dilemmas of Diversity: A New Paradigm of Integrating Diversity. World Futures 66 (3 & 4):192 – 218.
Peter Jones (1998). Political Theory and Cultural Diversity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):28-62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #112,737 of 1,098,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #79,853 of 1,098,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?