Paperless Philosophy as a Philosophical Method
Social Epistemology 24 (4):363-375 (2010)
| Abstract | I discuss the prospects for novel communication methods in academic research. I describe communication tools which could enhance the practice of conceptual analysis. | |||||||||
| Keywords | philosophy internet online surveys communication conceptual analysis | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam Ramsey (1992). Prototypes and Conceptual Analysis. Topoi 11 (1):59-70.
Craig A. Childress & Joy K. Asamen (1998). The Emerging Relationship of Psychology and the Internet: Proposed Guidelines for Conducting Internet Intervention Research. Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):19 – 35.
David T. Ritchie (2008). Mastering Legal Analysis and Communication. Carolina Academic Press.
Timo Honkela, Ville Könönen, Tiina Lindh‐Knuutila & Mari‐Sanna Paukkeri (2008). Simulating Processes of Concept Formation and Communication. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3):245-259.
Hsin-I. Liu (2007). How Is Communication Possible? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:51-56.
Rafael Capurro & Christoph Pingel (2002). Ethical Issues of Online Communication Research. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):189-194.
Per Sandin (2006). Has Psychology Debunked Conceptual Analysis? Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (2003). Concepts and Conceptual Analysis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):253-282.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-06Total downloads442 ( #146 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)269 ( #13 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
| Start a new thread | There are 3 threads in this forum |
| 2010-08-25 | |
|
Zbigniew Lukasiak
Warsaw University |
A link to an article going in the same direction:
This guy apparently has some theories about socio-technical systems and on academic publishing as a special case of such a system - see for example: http://brianwhitworth.com/STS/STS-chapter1.pdf Just browsing First Monday for the link I've also encountered http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2962/2580
Latest replies:
|
| 2010-08-27 | |
|
Emmanuel Rens
University of Geneva |
The Philosophical Registry is a very interesting project on its own, independantly of any use other than observing and participating in the systemic life of a philosophical community. However, it could lead to various uses and raise ethical questions : suppose that in few years it has grown enough to serve as a basis for the implementation of a philosophical version of the Turing Test, then, even a vote would not suffice to dissipate the ethical issue if it had not been addressed in the beggining.
There may be also issues related to preliminary theories on the nature of philosophy - specially in the last paragraph of the article - that could make this initial forumulation unsuited for an independant method of assessment. What if the new Lao Tzu gets the poorest evaluation? This exciting project diserves that its ethical aspects receive thorough attention and prospective. Emmanuel
Permanent link: http://philpapers.org/post/4616
Reply
|
| 2010-08-25 | |
|
Zbigniew Lukasiak
Warsaw University |
http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2642
Permanent link: http://philpapers.org/post/4564
Reply
|
