Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (12):17--42 (2004)
|Abstract||I discuss the quantum mechanical theory of consciousness and freewill offered by Stapp (1993, 1995, 2000, 2004). First I show that decoherence-based arguments do not work against this theory. Then discuss a number of problems with the theory: Stapp's separate accounts of consciousness and freewill are incompatible, the interpretations of QM they are tied to are questionable, the Zeno effect could not enable freewill as he suggests because weakness of will would then be ubiquitous, and the holism of measurement in QM is not a good explanation of the unity of consciousness for essentially the same reason that local interactions may seem incapable to account for it|
|Keywords||quantum mechanics consciousness free will stapp zeno decoherence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kirk A. Ludwig (1995). Why the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Mechanics is Irrelevant to the Mind-Body Problem. Psyche 2 (16).
Henry P. Stapp, A Model of the Quantum-Classical and Mind-Brain Connections, and of the Role of The Quantum Zeno Effect in the Physical Implementation of Conscious Intent.
Henry P. Stapp (1993). Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics. Springer-Verlag.
Henry P. Stapp (2005). Quantum Approaches to Consciousness. Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness.
Henry P. Stapp (1999). On Quantum Theories of the Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (1):61-65.
Henry P. Stapp (2004). Quantum Leaps in the Philosophy of Mind: Reply to Bourget's Critique. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (12):43-49.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads309 ( #560 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #10,208 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?