The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis

Theoria 77 (2):159-179 (2011)
Abstract
Social constructivist approaches to science have often been dismissed as inaccurate accounts of scientific knowledge. In this article, we take the claims of robust social constructivism (SC) seriously and attempt to find a theory which does instantiate the epistemic predicament as described by SC. We argue that Freudian psychoanalysis, in virtue of some of its well-known epistemic complications and conceptual confusions, provides a perfect illustration of what SC claims is actually going on in science. In other words, the features SC mistakenly ascribes to science in general correctly characterize the epistemic status of Freudian psychoanalysis. This sheds some light on the internal disputes in the field of psychoanalysis, on the sociology of psychoanalytic movement, and on the “war” that has been waged over Freud's legacy with his critics. In addition, our analysis offers an indirect and independent argument against SC as an account of bona fide science, by illustrating what science would look like if it were to function as SC claims it does
Keywords David Bloor  pseudoscience  social constructivism  epistemic defects  Sigmund Freud  Frank Cioffi  critique of psychoanalysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,493
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 25 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Martin Birnbach (1961). Neo-Freudian Social Philosophy. Stanford, Calif.,Stanford University Press.
Louis N. Sandowsky (2005). Existential Psychoanalysis and Freudian Psychoanalysis. Janus Head (Special Edition on Philosophical Practice) 8.
Margaret Nash (1989). Gr Nbaum and Psychoanalysis. Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-03-30

Total downloads

49 ( #34,405 of 1,102,505 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #16,543 of 1,102,505 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.