The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis
Theoria 77 (2):159-179 (2011)
|Abstract||Social constructivist approaches to science have often been dismissed as inaccurate accounts of scientific knowledge. In this article, we take the claims of robust social constructivism (SC) seriously and attempt to find a theory which does instantiate the epistemic predicament as described by SC. We argue that Freudian psychoanalysis, in virtue of some of its well-known epistemic complications and conceptual confusions, provides a perfect illustration of what SC claims is actually going on in science. In other words, the features SC mistakenly ascribes to science in general correctly characterize the epistemic status of Freudian psychoanalysis. This sheds some light on the internal disputes in the field of psychoanalysis, on the sociology of psychoanalytic movement, and on the “war” that has been waged over Freud's legacy with his critics. In addition, our analysis offers an indirect and independent argument against SC as an account of bona fide science, by illustrating what science would look like if it were to function as SC claims it does|
|Keywords||David Bloor pseudoscience social constructivism epistemic defects Sigmund Freud Frank Cioffi critique of psychoanalysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. Buekens & M. Boudry (2012). Psychoanalytic Facts as Unintended Institutional Facts. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):239-269.
Robert C. Richardson (1990). The "Tally Argument" and the Validation of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):668-676.
Martin Birnbach (1961). Neo-Freudian Social Philosophy. Stanford, Calif.,Stanford University Press.
Louis N. Sandowsky (2005). Existential Psychoanalysis and Freudian Psychoanalysis. Janus Head (Special Edition on Philosophical Practice) 8.
Kareem Khalifa (2010). Social Constructivism and the Aims of Science. Social Epistemology 24 (1):45 – 61.
Dany Nobus (2005). Knowing Nothing, Staying Stupid: Elements for a Psychoanalytic Epistemology. Routledge.
Herman Westerink (2012). The Heart of Man's Desire: Lacanian Psychoanalysis and Early Reformation Thought. Routledge.
Ted Meyer (2001). Shrink Yourself: The Complete Do-It-Yourself Guide to Freudian Psychoanalysis. Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Griffin.
Margaret Nash (1989). Gr Nbaum and Psychoanalysis. Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
Louise Braddock & Michael Lacewing (eds.) (2007). The Academic Face of Psychoanalysis: Papers in Philosophy, the Humanities, and the British Clinical Tradition. Routledge.
Evelien Geerts, Luce Irigaray: The (Un)Dutiful Daughter of Psychoanalysis. A Feminist ‘Moving Through and Beyond’ the Phallogocentric Discourse of Psychoanalysis.
John Ambrosio (2010). A Fearsome Trap: The Will to Know, the Obligation to Confess, and the Freudian Subject of Desire. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):728-741.
S. Goldberg (2009). The Social Virtues: Two Accounts. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 24 (4):237-248.
Jim Hopkins (1988). Epistemology and Depth Psychology. In C. Wright & P. Clark (eds.), Mind, Psychoanalysis, and Science. Blackwell.
Added to index2011-03-30
Total downloads36 ( #38,044 of 722,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?