The Limits of Ethics in International Relations: Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Human Rights in Transition
Graduate studies at Western
OUP Oxford (2009)
|Abstract||Ethical constraints on relations among individuals within and between societies have always reflected or invoked a higher authority than the caprices of human will. For over two thousand years Natural Law and Natural Rights were the constellations of ideas and presuppositions that fulfilled this role in the west, and exhibited far greater similarities than most commentators want to admit. Such ideas were the lens through which Europeans evaluated the rest of the world. In his major new book David Boucher rejects the view that Natural Rights constituted a secularisation of Natural Law ideas by showing that most of the significant thinkers in the field, in their various ways, believed that reason leads you to the discovery of your obligations, while God provides the ground for discharging them. Furthermore, the book maintains that Natural Rights and Human Rights are far less closely related than is often asserted because Natural Rights never cast adrift the religious foundationalism, whereas Human Rights, for the most part, have jettisoned the Christian metaphysics upon which both Natural Law and Natural Rights depended. Human Rights theories, on the whole, present us with foundationless universal constraints on the actions of individuals, both domestically and internationally. Finally, one of the principal contentions of the book is that these purportedly universal rights and duties almost invariably turn out to be conditional, and upon close scrutiny end up being 'special' rights and privileges as the examples of multicultural encounters, slavery and racism, and women's rights demonstrate.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$23.15 used (79% off) $27.23 new (76% off) $110.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. Fred Alford (2010). Narrative, Nature, and the Natural Law: From Aquinas to International Human Rights. Palgrave Macmillan.
Camilla Boisen (2012). The Limits of Ethics in International Relations: Natural Law, Natural Rights and Human Rights in Transition. Theoria 59 (133):98-101.
Gary B. Herbert (2005). On the Misconceived Genealogy of Human Rights. Social Philosophy Today 21:17-32.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
Jacqueline A. Laing, Rights. A Companion to Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand.
W. J. Talbott (2010). Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
Roger Trigg (2005). Morality Matters. Blackwell Pub..
Clark Butler (2002). Human Rights. Philo 5 (1):5-22.
Hugh V. McLachlan (2010). Moral Rights to Life, Both Natural and Non-Natural: Reflections on James Griffin's Account of Human Rights. Diametros 26:58-76.
Francis Oakley (2005). Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas. Continuum.
Rex Martin (2012). Natural Rights Human Rights and the Role of Social Recognition. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):91-115.
Derrick Darby (2009). Rights, Race, and Recognition. Cambridge University Press.
Anthony Pagden (2003). Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe's Imperial Legacy. Political Theory 31 (2):171-199.
Siegfried van Duffel (2013). Natural Rights to Welfare. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):641-664.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads7 ( #142,703 of 749,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,887 of 749,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?