Graduate studies at Western
Princeton University Press (1995)
|Abstract||Did Freud present a scientific hypothesis about the unconscious, as he always maintained and as many of his disciples keep repeating? This question has long prompted debates concerning the legitimacy and usefulness of psychoanalysis, and it is of utmost importance to Lacanian analysts, whose main project has been to stress Freud's scientific grounding. Here Jacques Bouveresse, a noted authority on Ludwig Wittgenstein, contributes to the debate by turning to this Austrian-born philosopher and contemporary of Freud for a candid assessment of the early issues surrounding psychoanalysis. Wittgenstein, who himself had delivered a devastating critique of traditional philosophy, sympathetically pondered Freud's claim to have produced a scientific theory in proposing a new model of the human psyche. What Wittgenstein recognized--and what Bouveresse so eloquently stresses for today's reader--is that psychoanalysis does not aim to produce a change limited to the intellect but rather seeks to provoke an authentic change of human attitudes. The beauty behind the theory of the unconscious for Wittgenstein is that it breaks away from scientific, causal explanations to offer new forms of thinking and speaking, or rather, a new mythology. Offering a critical view of all the texts in which Wittgenstein mentions Freud, Bouveresse immerses us in the intellectual climate of Vienna in the early part of the twentieth century. Although we come to see why Wittgenstein did not view psychoanalysis as a science proper, we are nonetheless made to feel the philosopher's sense of wonder and respect for the cultural task Freud took on as he found new ways meaningfully to discuss human concerns. Intertwined in this story of Wittgenstein's grappling with the theory of the unconscious is the story of how he came to question the authority of science and of philosophy itself. While aiming primarily at the clarification of Wittgenstein's opinion of Freud, Bouveresse's book can be read as a challenge to the French psychoanalytic school of Lacan and as a provocative commentary on cultural authority|
|Keywords||Philosophy Psychoanalysis Unconsciousness Freud Wittgenstein|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$6.00 used (84% off) $20.00 new (47% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BF175.4.P45.B6813 1995|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frank Cioffi (1998). Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Natsoulas (2000). Freud and Consciousness: X. The Place of Consciousness in Freud's Science. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 23 (4):525-561.
Margaret Nash (1989). Gr Nbaum and Psychoanalysis. Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
Jeffery L. Geller (1984). Wittgenstein on the “Charm” of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy Research Archives 10:57-65.
Constantine Sandis (2009). Hitchcock's Conscious Use of Freud's Unconscious. Europe's Journal of Psychology 3:56-81.
Roland Peterson & Sybe Terwee (1994). Can Functionalism Provide the Proper Basis for a Core Theory of Psychoanalysis? Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):463-469.
Frank Cioffi (2009). Making the Unconscious Conscious: Wittgenstein Versus Freud. Philosophia 37 (4):565-588.
James D. Marshall (2008). Wittgenstein, Freud, Dreaming and Education: Psychoanalytic Explanation as 'Une Façon de Parler'. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (5):606-620.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #29,913 of 738,566 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,566 )
How can I increase my downloads?