David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (4):479-495 (2010)
Policies that shift the costs of higher education from the taxpayer to the university student or graduate are increasingly popular, yet they have not been subjected to a thorough normative analysis. This paper provides a critical survey of the standard arguments that have been used in the public debate on higher education funding. These arguments are found to be wanting. In their place, the paper offers a more systematic approach for dealing with the normative issues raised by the funding of higher education. This approach is drawn from the political theory of John Rawls, whose view seeks to reconcile the values of equality, efficiency, and liberty. I show that, contrary to what we may think at first, an egalitarian approach like Rawls' does not in principle rule out policies that shift the funding burden from taxpayers to students or graduates. Which funding policy that approach selects as most fair will instead depend on the likely impact on the lifetime income prospects of the worst-off group in society, and this is a question which will need to be settled by empirical evidence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard J. Arneson (1999). Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Harry Brighouse & Adam Swift (2006). Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods. Ethics 116 (3):471-497.
Matthew Clayton (2001). Rawls and Natural Aristocracy. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):239-259.
Garrett Cullity (1995). Moral Free Riding. Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1):3–34.
H. L. A. Hart (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights? Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
Citations of this work BETA
Ben Kotzee & Christopher Martin (2013). Who Should Go to University? Justice in University Admissions. Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (4):623-641.
Tristan McCowan (2012). Is There a Universal Right to Higher Education? British Journal of Educational Studies 60 (2):111 - 128.
Similar books and articles
Marcus Peter Ford (2002). Beyond the Modern University: Toward a Constructive Postmodern University. Praeger.
Xiaoping Jiang (2011). Why Interculturalisation? A Neo-Marxist Approach to Accommodate Cultural Diversity in Higher Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (4):387-399.
Andrew Marks (1999). Really Useful Knowledge: The New Vocationalism in Higher Education and Its Consequences for Mature Students. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):157 - 169.
Xiaoping Jiang (2010). A Probe Into the Internationalisation of Higher Education in the New Zealand Context. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (8):881-897.
Samia Nour (2011). National, Regional and Global Perspectives of Higher Education and Science Policies in the Arab Region. Minerva 49 (4):387-423.
Nannerl O. Keohane (2006). Higher Ground: Ethics and Leadership in the Modern University. Duke University Press.
Glen Alan Jones, Patricia L. McCarney & Michael L. Skolnik (eds.) (2005). Creating Knowledge, Strengthening Nations: The Changing Role of Higher Education. University of Toronto Press.
J. Felix Lozano, Alejandra Boni, Jordi Peris & Andrés Hueso (2012). Competencies in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis From the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):132-147.
Michael Devaney & William Weber (2003). Abandoning the Public Good: How Universities Have Helped Privatize Higher Education. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):175-179.
Added to index2010-03-28
Total downloads56 ( #28,660 of 1,102,931 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #24,648 of 1,102,931 )
How can I increase my downloads?