David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):43-47 (2003)
This Report examines the ethical implications of electronic communication, focusing on the use of electronic mail (e-mail), considers its impact on a previously established patient-physician relationship, and the limitations in using e-mail to create a new patient-physician relationship. In its recommendations, this report offers guidance to physicians who use electronic mail to communicate with patients and online users. These guidelines maintain that e-mail should not be used to establish a patient-physician relationship, but rather to supplement personal encounters. When using e-mail, physicians hold the same ethical responsibilities to their patients as they do during other encounters and that information must be presented in a manner that meets professional standards. The report requires that physicians notify patients of e-mail's inherent limitations and that patients be given the opportunity to accept these limitations prior to the communication of privileged information. Finally, physicians should be aware of privacy and confidentiality concerns when using e-mail to communicate with patients
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James J. Cappel (1995). A Study of Individuals' Ethical Beliefs and Perceptions of Electronic Mail Privacy. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (10):819 - 827.
Thomas E. Ruggiero (2001). Electronic Mail and Listservs: Effective Journalistic Ethical Fora? Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (4):293 – 304.
Daniel Edward Shapiro & Charles Eric Schulman (1996). Ethical and Legal Issues in E-Mail Therapy. Ethics and Behavior 6 (2):107 – 124.
Thomas J. Hodson, Fred Englander & Valerie Englander (1999). Ethical, Legal and Economic Aspects of Employer Monitoring of Employee Electronic Mail. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):99 - 108.
M. Lavin (1988). What Doctors Should Call Their Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):129-131.
Lee Black & Emily Anderson (2007). Physicians, Patients and Confidentiality: The Role of Physicians in Electronic Health Records. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):50-51.
Frances M. Alexakos (2003). Attitudes of Rhode Island Primary Care Physicians Toward the Use of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer. Dissertation, Salve Regina University
J. Warren Salmon, William White & Joe Feinglass (1990). The Futures of Physicians: Agency and Autonomy Reconsidered. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Frances M. Alexakos, Attitudes of Rhode Island Primary Care Physicians Toward the Use of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.
Eugene J. Stein (1980). Doctors and Patients: Partners or Adversaries? [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):118-122.
Amy M. Bovi (2003). Use of Health-Related Online Sites. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):48-52.
Eugene V. Boisaubin & Laurence B. McCullough (2004). Prescribing Viagra in an Ethically Responsible Fashion. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):739 – 749.
David B. Resnik (2005). The Patient's Duty to Adhere to Prescribed Treatment: An Ethical Analysis. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188.
Herman Nys & Paul Schotsmans (2000). Professional Autonomy in Belgium. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):425-439.
Lindsay Cole, Jennifer Kesselheim & Aaron Kesselheim (2012). Ethical Issues in New Drug Prescribing. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):77-83.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads3 ( #308,184 of 1,102,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,049 of 1,102,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?