The epistemology of social facts: the evidential value of personal experience versus testimony
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesAlvin I. Goldman (2009). Social Epistemology: Theory and Applications. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (64):1-.
Antoni Diller (2008). Testimony From a Popperian Perspective. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):419-456.
Tony Ward (2006). English Law's Epistemology of Expert Testimony. Journal of Law and Society 33 (4):572-595.
Joel Buenting (2005). Re-Thinking the Duplication of Speaker/Hearer Belief in the Epistemology of Testimony. Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology 2 (2):43-48.
S. Mark Heim (2000). Saving the Particulars: Religious Experience and Religious Ends. Religious Studies 36 (4):435-453.
Tony Pitson (2006). George Campbell's Critique of Hume on Testimony. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (1):1-15.
Saul Traiger (2010). Experience and Testimony in Hume's Philosophy. Episteme 7 (1):42-57.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-25Total downloads25 ( #49,501 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
