The Moral Status of Fish. The Importance and Limitations of a Fundamental Discussion for Practical Ethical Questions in Fish Farming
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):843-860 (2012)
| Abstract | As the world population is growing and government directives tell us to consume more fatty acids, the demand for fish is increasing. Due to declines in wild fish populations, we have come to rely more and more on aquaculture. Despite rapid expansion of aquaculture, this sector is still in a relatively early developmental stage. This means that this sector can still be steered in a favorable direction, which requires discussion about sustainability. If we want to avoid similar problems to the ones we have experienced with livestock farming, we need to generate knowledge of the biology, profitability, environmental aspects, consumer awareness, and product appreciation of particular fish species. However, the discussion about a sustainable aquaculture also raises the question how we should treat fish. This moral question is regularly addressed as a problem of applied ethics with a focus on tailoring ethical principles to practical questions. In this article we do not deny the importance of the practical accounts, but we start from the fundamental question whether and why fish matter in our moral deliberations, i.e., from the discussion on moral status. We elaborate the distinction between moral considerability and moral significance in order to show both the importance and the limitations of the discussion about moral status for practical problems in aquaculture. We illustrate these points with a case-study about the farming of a specific fish species, the African catfish. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBernice Bovenkerk & Franck L. B. Meijboom (2013). Fish Welfare in Aquaculture: Explicating the Chain of Interactions Between Science and Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):41-61.
Jenny Bergqvist & Stefan Gunnarsson (2013). Finfish Aquaculture: Animal Welfare, the Environment, and Ethical Implications. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):75-99.
Karianne Kalshoven & Franck L. B. Meijboom (forthcoming). Sustainability at the Crossroads of Fish Consumption and Production Ethical Dilemmas of Fish Buyers at Retail Organizations in The Netherlands. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Saara Kupsala, Pekka Jokinen & Markus Vinnari (2013). Who Cares About Farmed Fish? Citizen Perceptions of the Welfare and the Mental Abilities of Fish. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):119-135.
Frederike Kaldewaij (2013). Does Fish Welfare Matter? On the Moral Relevance of Agency. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):63-74.
Ingrid Olesen, Anne Ingeborg Myhr & G. Kristin Rosendal (2011). Sustainable Aquaculture: Are We Getting There? Ethical Perspectives on Salmon Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (4):381-408.
Kate Millar & Sandy Tomkins (2007). Ethical Analysis of the Use of GM Fish: Emerging Issues for Aquaculture Development. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5).
Sena S. De Silva & Giovanni M. Turchini (2008). Towards Understanding the Impacts of the Pet Food Industry on World Fish and Seafood Supplies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (5).
Stephanie Yue Cottee & Paul Petersan (2009). Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5).
F. L. B. Meijboom & B. Bovenkerk (2013). Fish Welfare: Challenge for Science and Ethics—Why Fish Makes the Difference. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):1-6.
Colin Allen (forthcoming). Fish Cognition and Consciousness. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Victoria A. Braithwaite, Felicity Huntingford & Ruud den Bos (2013). Variation in Emotion and Cognition Among Fishes. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):7-23.
Paul R. Noble (1994). Hermeneutics and Post-Modernism: Can We Have a Radical Reader-Response Theory? Part I. Religious Studies 30 (4):419 - 436.
Kriton Grigorakis (forthcoming). Ethical Issues in Aquaculture Production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-12-15Total downloads4 ( #178,434 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
