Synthese 172 (1) (2010)
|Abstract||The Puzzle of the Hats is a betting arrangement which seems to show that a Dutch book can be made against a group of rational players with common priors who act in the common interest and have full trust in the other players’ rationality. But we show that appearances are misleading—no such Dutch book can be made. There are four morals. First, what can be learned from the puzzle is that there is a class of situations in which credences and betting rates diverge. Second, there is an analogy between ways of dealing with situations of this kind and different policies for sequential choice. Third, there is an analogy with strategic voting, showing that the common interest is not always served by expressing how things seem to you in social decision-making. And fourth, our analysis of the Puzzle of the Hats casts light on a recent controversy about the Dutch book argument for the Sleeping Beauty.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriel Uzquiano (2010). How to Solve the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever in Two Questions. Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
István Aranyosi (2009). The Reappearing Act. Acta Analytica 24 (1):1-10.
Brian Rabern & Landon Rabern (2008). A Simple Solution to the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever. [REVIEW] Analysis 68 (2):105-112.
C. Waidacher (1997). Hidden Assumptions in the Dutch Book Argument. Theory and Decision 43 (3):293-312.
Darren Bradley & Hannes Leitgeb (2006). When Betting Odds and Credences Come Apart: More Worries for Dutch Book Arguments. Analysis 66 (290):119–127.
Pablo Rychter (2009). There is No Puzzle About Change. Dialectica 63 (1):7-22.
John Turri (2012). A Puzzle About Withholding. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):355-364.
Robert C. Robinson (2007). S5 Solution to the Red Hat Puzzle. Disputatio 2 (22).
Added to index2009-03-04
Total downloads49 ( #21,805 of 549,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,270 of 549,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?