Simplicius and the early history of greek planetary theory
Perspectives on Science 10 (2):155-167 (2002)
| Abstract | : In earlier work, Bernard R. Goldstein and the present author have introduced a procedural rule for historical inquiry, which requires that one take pains to establish the credibility of any citation of ancient thought by later writers in antiquity through a process of verification. In this paper, I shall apply what I call the Rule of Ancient Citations to Simplicius' interpretation of Aristotle's remarks in Meta L. 8, which is the primary point of departure for the modern understanding of Greek planetary theory. I first sketch several lines of argument that lead me to conclude that Simplicius' interpretation should not be accepted because it assumes a concern with planetary phenomena unknown to the Greeks before the late 2nd and early 1st centuries BC. Then, after showing that there is a fairly well defined range of readings of Aristotle's remarks more in keeping with what we actually know of astronomy in the 5th and 4th centuries BC, I conclude that neither Aristotle's report about the Eudoxan and Callippan accounts of the celestial motions nor Simplicius' interpretation of this report is a good starting point for our understanding of early Greek planetary theory | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesH. J. Blumenthal (1982). The Psychology of (?) Simplicius' Commentary on the de Anima. In H. J. Blumenthal & A. C. Lloyd (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus, and Simplicius: Papers and Discussions of a Colloquium Held at Liverpool, 15-16 April 1982. Liverpool University Press.
Ian Mueller (2006). Physics and Astronomy: Aristotle's Physics II.2.193b22–194a12. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2):175-206.
Zeev Perelmuter (2010). Nous and Two Kinds of Episteme in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Phronesis 55 (3):228-254.
Stephen Menn (2010). Simplicius on the Theaetetus (In Physica 17,38-18,23 Diels). Phronesis 55 (3):255-270.
Gaskin (1998). Simplicius on the Meaning of Sentences: A Commentary on In Cat. 396,30-397,28. Phronesis 43 (1):42-62.
R. Gaskin (1998). Simplicius on the Meaning of Sentences: A Commentary on "In Cat." 396,30-397,28. Phronesis 43 (1):42 - 62.
L. S. B. MacCoull (1998). The Anaximander Saying in its Sixth-Century (C. E.) Context. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):85-96.
Rachel Barney (2009). Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority. Antiquorum Philosophia 3:101-120.
Marc-Antoine Gavray (2011). Archytas Lu Par Simplicius. Un Art de la Conciliation. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):85-158.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 549,700 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,700 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
