David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Princeton University Press (1990)
Recognized in his day as a man of letters equaling Rousseau and Voltaire in France and rivaling Samuel Johnson, David Hume passed from favor in the Victorian age--his work, it seemed, did not pursue Truth but rather indulged in popularization. Although Hume is once more considered as one of the greatest British philosophers, scholars now tend to focus on his thought rather than his writing. To round out our understanding of Hume, M. A. Box in this book charts the interrelated development of Hume's literary ambitions, theories of style, and compositional practice from his Treatise in 1739 through the Enquiries. In so doing, Box makes the case for Hume's career-long concern with the presentational modes of reaching an audience for his philosophical writings. Hume reacted to the popular failure of his masterpiece, A Treatise of Human Nature, Box suggests, by self-consciously exploring strategies in his subsequent works for agreeably bringing his readership to participate in the act of philosophizing. Combining a sensitive grasp of the ways Restoration period and eighteenth-century writers conceived the relations between rhetoric and philosophy with sound readings of particular texts, Box shows how Hume's literary concerns went beyond matters of style to involve persona, structure, and doctrine. While this book helps explain long-standing ambiguities surrounding Hume, especially by pointing out the tension between his created persona and his own voice, it also serves as an excellent introduction to his philosophy.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$4.99 used (89% off) $40.96 new (4% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B1498.B63 1990|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kate Abramson (2007). Hume's Distinction Between Philosophical Anatomy and Painting. Philosophy Compass 2 (5):680–698.
Kate Abramson (2006). Happy to Unite, or Not? Philosophy Compass 1 (3):290-302.
David L. Marshall (2007). Literature Survey Early Modern Rhetoric: Recent Research in German, Italian, French, and English. Intellectual History Review 17 (1):107-135.
Similar books and articles
David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature (Two-Volume Set). Clarendon Press.
M. A. Stewart (1992). The Suasive Art of David Hume By M. A. Box Princeton University Press, 1990, Xii + 268 Pp., $29.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy 67 (260):266-.
David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2011). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. OUP Oxford.
Annette Baier (2011). The Pursuits of Philosophy: An Introduction to the Life and Thought of David Hume. Harvard University Press.
David Hume (2007). A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.
David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. Clarendon Press.
Scott Black (2010). Thinking in Time in Hume's Essays. Hume Studies 36 (1):3-23.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #444,558 of 1,934,425 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,835 of 1,934,425 )
How can I increase my downloads?