Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 28 (3):516-532 (2013)
|Abstract||Some scholars have argued that Margaret Cavendish was ambivalent about women's roles and capabilities, for she seems sometimes to hold that women are naturally inferior to men, but sometimes that this inferiority is due to inferior education. I argue that attention to Cavendish's natural philosophy can illuminate her views on gender. In section II I consider the implications of Cavendish's natural philosophy for her views on male and female nature, arguing that Cavendish thought that such natures were not fixed. However, I argue that although Cavendish thought women needed to be better educated, and could change if they had such an education, she also thought their education should reinforce the feminine virtues. Section III examines Cavendish's notorious “Preface to the Reader” (from The Worlds Olio), where Cavendish claims that women are naturally inferior in strength and intelligence to men. Section IV addresses another notorious Cavendish text, “Female Orations,” arguing that its message is similar to that of the “Preface to the Reader.” Nonetheless, although Cavendish held conventional views about male and female nature and appropriate gender roles, she also recognized how social institutions could limit women's freedom; section V explores the complexities of Cavendish's critique of one such institution, patriarchal marriage|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stewart Duncan (2012). Debating Materialism: Cavendish, Hobbes, and More. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):391-409.
Karen Detlefsen (2007). Reason and Freedom Margaret Cavendish on the Order and Disorder of Nature. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):157-191.
Margaret Cavendish Newcastle (2001). Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Karen Detlefsen (2009). Margaret Cavendish on the Relation Between God and World. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):421-438.
Sarah Hutton (2003). Margaret Cavendish and Henry More. In Stephen Clucas (ed.), A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle. Ashgate.
Stephen Clucas (ed.) (2003). A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle. Ashgate.
Kourken Michaelian (2009). Margaret Cavendish's Epistemology. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):31 – 53.
Sarah Hutton (1996). In Dialogue with Thomas Hobbes: Margaret Cavendish’s Natural Philosophy. Women’s Writing 4:421-32.
Deborah Boyle (2013). Margaret Cavendish. Philosophers' Magazine 60 (-1):63 - 65.
Ronald Laymon (1994). Demonstrative Induction, Old and New Evidence and the Accuracy of the Electrostatic Inverse Square Law. Synthese 99 (1):23 - 58.
Marina Leslie (1996). Gender, Genre and the Utopian Body in Margaret Cavendish's Blazing World. Utopian Studies 7 (1):6 - 24.
Deborah Boyle (2006). Fame, Virtue, and Government: Margaret Cavendish on Ethics and Politics. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2):251-289.
Jacqueline Broad (2002). Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2012-06-23
Total downloads11 ( #107,689 of 750,430 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,076 of 750,430 )
How can I increase my downloads?