On the boundary between laboratory 'givens' and laboratory 'tangibles'
Foundations of Chemistry 12 (3):187-202 (2010)
| Abstract | structure of a laboratory report (generalized from Italian, Chinese and US sources), we distill a fifth flavor, the givens, whose flip side is the freedoms or tangibles of an experiment. (Stated in terms of computer science, we are trying to find inputs and outputs, but these turn out to be surprisingly vague in chemistry.) Then, in the service of a white-boxing ethos (which sounds less severe than ‘anti black-boxing’), we establish a movable boundary between givens and tangibles, with implications for ‘ontological attitudes’ and for the future of chemistry. Next, in revisiting a 2002 exchange between Schummer and Laszlo, which might be paraphrased as the chemist-as-philosopher versus chemist-as-artisan, we apply a second kind of sliding scale which seems to harmonize the discussion. Finally, on a possibly quixotic note, we look briefly at a third kind of sliding scale, now aimed squarely at ontology itself. For illustrative purposes, we adopt an atomocentric viewpoint (as distinct from atomistic), and assign it the provisional name ‘Fuzzy CH4 Ontology’ | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCharles Seibert (2001). Charley Peirce's Head Start in Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 3 (3):201-226.
Dean C. Allard (1990). The Fish Commission Laboratory and Its Influence on the Founding of the Marine Biological Laboratory. Journal of the History of Biology 23 (2):251 - 270.
James R. Griesemer & Michael J. Wade (1988). Laboratory Models, Causal Explanation and Group Selection. Biology and Philosophy 3 (1):67-96.
Steindór J. Erlingsson (2009). The Plymouth Laboratory and the Institutionalization of Experimental Zoology in Britain in the 1920s. Journal of the History of Biology 42 (1):151 - 183.
Francesco Guala (2010). Cooperation in and Out of the Lab: A Comment on Binmore's Paper. Mind and Society 9 (2):159-169.
James A. Marcum (2001). Constructing a Scientific Paper: Howell's Prothrombin Laboratory Notebook and Paper. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):293 – 310.
Francesco Guala & Luigi Mittone (2005). Experiments in Economics: External Validity and the Robustness of Phenomena. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (4):495-515.
M. Peiffer Ann, E. Hugenschmidt Christina & J. Laurienti Paul (forthcoming). Ethics in 15 Min Per Week. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Ann Peiffer, Christina Hugenschmidt & Paul Laurienti (forthcoming). Ethics in 15 Min Per Week. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Daniel Bischur (2011). Animated Bodies in Immunological Practices: Craftsmanship, Embodied Knowledge, Emotions and Attitudes Toward Animals. Human Studies 34 (4):407-429.
Sharon E. Kingsland (2009). Frits Went's Atomic Age Greenhouse: The Changing Labscape on the Lab-Field Border. Journal of the History of Biology 42 (2):289 - 324.
Michael T. Stuart (2012). REVIEW: James R. Brown, Laboratory of the Mind. [REVIEW] Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):237-241.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-11-18Total downloads6 ( #145,615 of 549,073 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
