Phronesis 49 (1):1-23 (2004)
|Abstract||Phaedo of Elis was well-known as a writer of Socratic dialogues, and it seems inconceivable that Plato could have been innocent of intertextuality when, excusing himself on the grounds of illness, he made him the narrator of one of his own: the "Phaedo". In fact the psychological model outlined by Socrates in this dialogue converges with the evidence we have (especially from fragments of the Zopyrus) for Phaedo's own beliefs about the soul. Specifically, Phaedo seems to have thought that non-rational desires were ineliminable epiphenomena of the body, that reason was something distinct, and that the purpose of philosophy was its 'cure' and 'purification'. If Plato's intention with the "Phaedo" is to assert the separability and immortality of reason (whatever one might think about desire and pleasure), then Phaedo provides a useful standpoint for him. In particular, Phaedo has arguments that are useful against the 'harmony-theorists' (and are the more useful rhetorically speaking since it is only over the independence of reason that Phaedo disagrees with them). At the same time as allying himself with Phaedo, however, Plato is able to improve on him by adding to the demonstration that reason is independent a proof that it is actually immortal|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
G. Boys-Stones (2004). Phaedo of Elis and Plato on the Soul. Phronesis 49 (1):1-23.
Brian Prince (2011). The Form of Soul in the Phaedo. Plato 11 11.
David Bostock (1986). Plato's Phaedo. Oxford University Press.
Plato (1949). Meno. New York, Liberal Arts Press.
Plato (1999/2009). Phaedo. Oxford University Press.
Kristian Urstad, Pleasure in Plato's Phaedo. Philosophical Pathways.
M. Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the Phaedo. Phronesis 48 (2):89-115.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads17 ( #72,089 of 556,907 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,122 of 556,907 )
How can I increase my downloads?