Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):63-71 (1998)
|Abstract||The authors demonstrate that ethical judgments can be biased when previous judgments serve as a point of reference against which a current situation is judged. Scenarios describing ethical or unethical sales practices were used in an experiment to prime subjects who subsequently rated the ethics of an ethically ambiguous target scenario. The target tended to be rated as more ethical by subjects primed with unethical scenarios, and less ethical by subjects primed with ethical scenarios. This "contrast effect," however, is contingent upon individual differences. Specifically, subjects with high (versus low) needs for cognition are more likely to process and use the information presented in the priming scenarios as a point of reference against which to judge the target situation, and hence more prone to the contrastive bias. Implications for avoiding unintentional moral relativism in business decision-making are discussed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tammy Swenson-Lepper (2005). Ethical Sensitivity for Organizational Communication Issues: Examining Individual and Organizational Differences. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3):205 - 231.
Joan Marie McMahon & Robert J. Harvey (2007). The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (4):335 - 357.
Mark A. Davis, Nancy Brown Johnson & Douglas G. Ohmer (1998). Issue-Contingent Effects on Ethical Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):373-389.
Pedro Augusto Marques & José Azevedo-Pereira (2009). Ethical Ideology and Ethical Judgments in the Portuguese Accounting Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):227 - 242.
J. Tsalikis (1990). Ethical Beliefs' Differences of Males and Females M. Ortiz-Buonafina. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):509 - 517.
J. Tsalikis & M. Ortiz-Buonafina (1990). Ethical Beliefs' Differences of Males and Females. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):509-517.
Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren (2011). Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
Leslie M. Dawson (1997). Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1143-1152.
Suzanne C. Wagner & G. Lawrence Sanders (2001). Considerations in Ethical Decision-Making and Software Piracy. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):161 - 167.
Karen J. Maher & Jeffrey J. Bailey (1999). The Effects of Transgressor Sex on Judgments of Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):157 - 171.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,723 of 739,165 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?