The legacies of liberalism and oppressive relations: facing a dilemma for the subject of moral education
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 33 (1):3-22 (2004)
In modern Western moral and political theory the notion of the liberal subject has flourished as the locus of moral experience, interpretation and critique. Through this conceptual lens on subjectivity, individuals are enabled to shape and regulate their interactions in arguably desirable ways, e.g. through principles of respect for persons and the constraints of reciprocal rights, and moral education has largely adopted this perspective. However, this article argues that some kinds of morally significant relations?those framed by social groups related to each other through structures of hierarchical power?constitute a different kind of subjectivity that needs more theoretical and empirical attention. In contrast to four core characteristics of liberal subjectivity, a view of subjectivity that can be located in how individuals are members of particular kinds of social groups is offered. It is argued that unless it can accommodate working with attention to this form of subjectivity as well, moral education runs the risk of itself contributing to forms of oppression such as racism, instead of being a means of combating them
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeff Stickney (2010). Reconciling Forms of Asian Humility with Assessment Practices and Character Education Programs in North America. Ethics and Education 5 (1):67-80.
Similar books and articles
Dwight Boyd (2011). Learning to Leave Liberalism…and Live with Complicity, Conundrum and Moral Chagrin. Journal of Moral Education 40 (3):329-337.
Ger Snik & Johan De Jong (1995). Liberalism and Denominational Schools. Journal of Moral Education 24 (4):395-407.
Pat White (1980). Political Education and Moral Education or Bringing Up Children to Be Decent Members of Society. Journal of Moral Education 9 (3):147-155.
Brenda Cohen (1983). Ethical Objectivity and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 12 (2):131-136.
Zhu Xiaoman & Liu Cilin* (2004). Teacher Training for Moral Education in China. Journal of Moral Education 33 (4):481-494.
Ann Higgins‐D'Alessandro (1996). Moral Education as an Historical/Political/Social Science. Journal of Moral Education 25 (1):57-66.
Richard Pring (2001). Education as a Moral Practice. Journal of Moral Education 30 (2):101-112.
Allegra De Laurentiis (2005). Subjects in the Ancient and Modern World: On Hegel's Theory of Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Anna Strhan (2012). Levinas, Subjectivity, Education: Towards an Ethics of Radical Responsibility. Wiley.
Dwight Boyd (1996). A Question of Adequate Aims. Journal of Moral Education 25 (1):21-29.
Derek Wright (1983). Religious Education From the Perspective of Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 12 (2):111-115.
Paul L. van der Plas (1985). Moral Education in Holland. Journal of Moral Education 14 (2):111-119.
Dwight Boyd & Mary Louise Arnold (2000). Teachers' Beliefs, Antiracism and Moral Education: Problems of Intersection. Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):23-45.
David Resnick * (2004). A Case Study in Jewish Moral Education: (Non‐)Rape of the Beautiful Captive. Journal of Moral Education 33 (3):307-319.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads9 ( #165,606 of 1,101,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #191,964 of 1,101,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?