|Abstract||First: there is ample precedent for what I am doing. Socrates, for example, examined the religious beliefs of his contemporaries-- especially the belief that we ought to do what the gods command--and showed them to be both ill-founded and conceptually confused. I wish to follow in his footsteps though not to share in his fate. A glass of wine, not of poison, would be my preferred reward.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Robert Lehe (2009). The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument From Evil. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.
David O'Connor (2012). Spectres of False Divinity: Hume's Moral Atheism. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 36 (2):236-239.
Mark T. Nelson (1991). Naturalistic Ethics and the Argument From Evil. Faith and Philosophy 8 (3):368-379.
Lara Denis (2003). Kant's Criticism of Atheism. Kant-Studien 94 (2):198-219.
Matthew Alun Ray, On the Principles and Presuppositions of Atheism and Agnosticism in Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche.
Joel Marks (2011). Atheism, Amorality, and Animals. The New York Times.
Stijn van Impe (forthcoming). Kant's Moral Theism and Moral Despair Argument Against Atheism. Heythrop Journal.
Thomas Holden (2010). Spectres of False Divinity: Hume's Moral Atheism. Oxford University Press.
Merold Westphal (1987). Taking Suspicion Seriously. Faith and Philosophy 4 (1):26-42.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads33 ( #36,649 of 551,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,242 of 551,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?