|Abstract||In the field of business ethics, Adam Smith has generally been viewed with a measure of suspicion. Smith`s famous invocation of the invisible hand – according to which self-interest promotes the greater good -- has generally been seen as a fundamental challenge to a discipline committed to the opposite premise that the public interest cannot be advanced unless the egoism of economic actors is restrained by a more socially conscious mindset. To the extent that Adam Smith has been brought into the fold of the discipline, it has involved showing that his authority cannot be summoned to fully support the free market sceptics of business ethics. Little has thus far been done, however, to illustrate that Smith`s moral writings actually contain the fundamentals of a business ethics teaching. This paper analyzes his moral thought with a view to inferring a Smithean framework of business ethics to guide managers. In sympathy with the field, Smith holds that self-interest ought to be subordinated to moral imperatives, even in the business world. Against the grain of the field, though, Smith rejects the principles of corporate social responsibility on the argument that benevolent impulses cannot be expected to prevail in the commercial arena. Instead of consciously trying to advance the social good, Smith`s ideal manager will endeavor to personally live up to the standards enforced by an impartial spectator of his conduct. This internalized onlooker expects a limited degree of benevolence, a constant exercise of moderation, along with the occasional exhibition of magnanimity whenever challenging situations arise. Still, the overriding demand is for the manager to abide by the dictums of justice and prudence. While the Smithean inspired manager will never reach the pinnacle of virtue, they can do better than merely adopt enlightened self-interest as their lodestar.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Eric Schliesser (2008). D. D. Raphael,The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy,and Leonidas Montes,Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought:The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy;Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought. Ethics 118 (3):569-575.
Jack Weinstein, Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life, by James R. Otteson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Pp. 352. H/B £50.00, $70.00, P/B £19.95, $26.00. [REVIEW]
Gloria Vivenza (2001). Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith's Thought. OUP Oxford.
David Wilson & William Dixon (2011). Das Adam Smith Problem - A Critical Realist Perspective. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):251-272.
D. D. Raphael (2007/2009). The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Ryan Patrick Hanley (2009). Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Harold B. Jones (forthcoming). Marcus Aurelius, the Stoic Ethic, and Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics.
Edward W. Coker (1990). Adam Smith's Concept of the Social System. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):139 - 142.
John D. Bishop (1995). Adam Smith's Invisible Hand Argument. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):165 - 180.
Farhad Rassekh (2000). Smith, Friedman, and Self-Interest in Ethical Society. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):659-674.
Added to index2009-06-04
Total downloads22 ( #56,207 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?