Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The thesis tries to define and explain the rudiments of a 'nonphilosophical' or 'non-decisional' theory of materialism on the basis of a theoretical framework provided by the 'non-philosophy' of Francois Laruelle. Neither anti-philosophical nor anti-materialist in character, non-materialism tries to construct a rigorously transcendental theory of matter by using certain instances of philosophical materialism as its source material. The materialist decision to identify the real with matter is seen to retain a structural isomorphy with the phenomenological decision to identify the real with the phenomenon. Both decisions are shown to operate on the basis of a methodological idealism; materialism on account of its confusion of matter and concept; phenomenology by virtue of its confusion of phenomenon and logos. By dissolving the respectively 'materiological' and 'phenomenological' amlphibolies which are the result of the failure to effect a rigorously transcendental separation between matter and concept on the one hand; and between phenomenon and logos on the other, non-materialist theory proposes to mobilise the non-hybrid or non-decisional concepts of a 'matter-without-concept' and of a 'phenomenon-without-logos' in order to effect a unified but non-unitary theory of phenomenology and materialism. The result is a materialisation of thinking that operates according to matter's foreclosure to decision. That is to say, a transcendental theory of the phenomenon that licenses limitless phenomenological plasticity, unconstrained by the apparatus of eidetic intuition or any horizon of apophantic disclosure; yet one which is simultaneously a transcendental theory of matter, uncontaminated by the bounds of empirical perception and free of all phenomenological circumscription|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Adrian Johnston (2013). Prolegomena to Any Future Materialism. Northwestern University Press.
Dimitris Papadopoulos (2010). Activist Materialism. Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):64-83.
Mario Bunge (2010). Matter and Mind: A Philosophical Inquiry. Springer Verlag.
David R. Cole (2011). Matter in Motion: The Educational Materialism of Gilles Deleuze. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (s1):3-17.
Daniel Little (1986). Historical Materialism and Capital. Topoi 5 (2):187-196.
M. Zuidgeest (1977). The Concept of Matter in Modern Atomic Theory. Acta Biotheoretica 26 (1).
Glenn Tiller (2006). The Unknowable: The Pragmatist Critique of Matter. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):206-228.
Kurt Smith (2010). Matter Matters: Metaphysics and Methodology in the Early Modern Period. Oxford University Press.
N. Sieroka (2010). Geometrization Versus Transcendent Matter: A Systematic Historiography of Theories of Matter Following Weyl. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):769-802.
Jane Bennett (2004). The Force of Things: Steps Toward an Ecology of Matter. Political Theory 32 (3):347-372.
Samantha Frost (2005). Hobbes and the Matter of Self-Consciousness. Political Theory 33 (4):495 - 517.
Stewart Duncan (2012). Toland, Leibniz, and Active Matter. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:249-78.
John W. Yolton (1991). Locke and French Materialism. Oxford University Press.
Richard Edwards (2011). Theory Matters: Representation and Experimentation in Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):522-534.
Monika Wulz (2012). The Material Memory of History: Edgar Zilsel's Epistemology of Historiography. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):91-105.
Added to index2012-01-10
Total downloads17 ( #78,143 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,287 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?