Functionalist response-dependence avoids missing explanations

Analysis 71 (2):297-300 (2011)
I argue that there is a flaw in the way that response-dependence has been formulated in the literature, and this flawed formulation has been correctly attacked by Mark Johnston’s Missing Explanation Argument. Moving to a better formulation, which is analogous to the move from behaviourism to functionalism, avoids the Missing Explanation Argument.
Keywords Response-dependence  Functionalism  Explanation
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Darren Bradley, Functionalist response-dependence avoids missing explanations
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Ralph Wedgwood (1997). The Essence of Response-Dependence. European Review of Philosophy 3:31-54.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

218 ( #13,200 of 1,911,370 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

56 ( #10,382 of 1,911,370 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.