Graduate studies at Western
Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):279-296 (2009)
|Abstract||This article seeks to demonstrate that in his recent reading of the role of religion in the postsecular public realm, Habermas overlooks a most fundamental dimension of religion: its power to symbolically institute communities. For his part, Gauchet starts from a vision of religion in which this fundamental dimension is central. In his evaluation of the role of religion in postsecular society, he therefore arrives at results which are very different from those of Habermas. However, I believe that Gauchet too underestimates the extent to which religion’s power of symbolic community institution has remained intact within modern, postsecular society. In support of this position, I show how relatively heterogeneous phenomena within Western societies, such as the renewed importance of religion in the public realm, the revival of certain forms of nationalism and the associated demand for recognition of group rights and hence for forms of legal pluralism, may prefigure a new transformation of the public realm.|
|Keywords||Habermas Gauchet Religion Public realm Representation Symbolic community|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anthony Paul Smith & Daniel Whistler (eds.) (2010). After the Postsecular and the Postmodern: New Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
Phil Enns (2007). Habermas, Reason, and the Problem of Religion: The Role of Religion in the Public Sphere. Heythrop Journal 48 (6):878–894.
Andrea Baumeister (2011). The Use of “Public Reason” by Religious and Secular Citizens: Limitations of Habermas' Conception of the Role of Religion in the Public Realm. Constellations 18 (2):222-243.
Robert L. Perkins (2009). Martin Beck Matuštík, Radical Evil and the Scarcity of Hope: Postsecular Meditations (Indiana University Series in the Philosophy of Religion). [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1):47-49.
Maeve Cooke (2007). A Secular State for a Postsecular Society? Postmetaphysical Political Theory and the Place of Religion. Constellations 14 (2):224-238.
Pieter Duvenage (2010). Communicative Reason and Religion: The Case of Habermas. Sophia 49 (3):343-357.
Natalie Doyle (2006). The Sacred, Social Creativity and the State. Critical Horizons 7 (1):207-238.
Cristina Lafont (2007). Religion in the Public Sphere: Remarks on Habermas's Conception of Public Deliberation in Postsecular Societies. Constellations 14 (2):239-259.
Added to index2009-08-05
Total downloads38 ( #35,926 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?