David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):593-610 (2001)
This article asserts that graduate study should include preparation for participation in the process of self-regulation to assure the responsible conduct of research in the scientific community. This article outlines the various ways in which doctoral study can incorporate such preparation. These suggested ways include the inculcation of general attitudes and values about professional self-regulation, various ways doctoral study can be configured so that future scientists are prepared to participate in the deterrence, detection and sanctioning of scientific wrongdoing. The stages of doctoral study in the United States and their relevance to preparation for self-regulations are also discussed. Recommendations regarding an extended role for faculty advisors, graduate assistantships, coursework and departmental policies and activities are also advanced.
|Keywords||professional self-regulation doctoral socialization responsible conduct of science detection deterrence and sanctioning of misconduct|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sara R. Jordan & Phillip W. Gray (2013). Research Integrity in Greater China: Surveying Regulations, Perceptions and Knowledge of Research Integrity From a Hong Kong Perspective. Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):125-137.
Similar books and articles
Runtian Jing & John L. Graham (2008). Values Versus Regulations: How Culture Plays its Role. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):791 - 806.
Burkard Eberlein & Dirk Matten (2009). Business Responses to Climate Change Regulation in Canada and Germany: Lessons for MNCs From Emerging Economies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):241 - 255.
Sandra Bruneau (1998). Adding Pep (Protocol, Ethics, and Policies) to the Preparation of New Professionals. Ethics and Behavior 8 (3):249 – 267.
Hans Vonk (1991). Some Trends in the Development of Curricula for the Professional Preparation of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in Europe: A Comparative Study. British Journal of Educational Studies 39 (2):117 - 137.
Melissa S. Anderson, Elo Charity Oju & Tina M. R. Falkner (2001). Help From Faculty: Findings From the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):487-503.
Judith P. Swazey (1991). Are Physicians a “Delinquent Community”?: Issues in Professional Competence, Conduct, and Self-Regulation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):581 - 590.
Haico Te Kulve & Arie Rip (2011). Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-Engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):699-714.
Margaret Grevatt (1986). Commentary on “Professional Power & Self-Regulation” and “Professional Values and the Problem of Regulation”. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (2):60-65.
Georgiana Shick Tryon (2001). School Psychology Students' Beliefs About Their Preparation and Concern with Ethical Issues. Ethics and Behavior 11 (4):375 – 394.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #195,517 of 1,096,595 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?