Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):91-109 (2012)
|Abstract||The sublime has been a relatively neglected topic in recent work in philosophical aesthetics, with existing discussions confined mainly to problems in Kant's theory.1 Given the revival of interest in his aesthetic theory and the influence of the Kantian sublime compared to other eighteenth-century accounts, this focus is not surprising. Kant's emphasis on nature also sets his theory apart from other eighteenth-century theories that, although making nature central, also give explicit attention to moral character and mathematical ideas and generally devote more discussion to art and artifacts than Kant did.2 Recent postmodern and poststructuralist theories of the sublime tend to concentrate on the concept in art and ..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Crowther (1989). The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art. Oxford University Press.
C. E. Emmer (2008). Crowther and the Kantian Sublime in Art. In Valerio Rohden, Ricardo R. Terra & Guido A. de Almeida (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants: Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses [Right and Peace in Kant's Philosophy: Proceedings of the 10th International Kant Congress] 5 vols. Walter de Gruyter.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2012). The Moral Source of the Kantian Sublime. In Timothy Costelloe (ed.), The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present (pp. 37-49). Cambridge University Press.
C. E. Emmer (2001). The Senses of the Sublime: Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Sublime in Kant's Critique of Judgment. In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
James Kirwan (2005). Sublimity: The Non-Rational and the Irrational in the History of Aesthetics. Routledge.
Robert R. Clewis (2009). The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Malcolm Budd (1996). The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):207-222.
Gabriele Tomasi (2005). Kant on Painting and the Representation of the Sublime. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):545-567.
Peter K. Walhout (2009). The Beautiful and the Sublime in Natural Science. Zygon 44 (4):757-776.
Yi-hui Huang (2013). The Digital Sublime: Lessons From Kelli Connell's Double Life. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (4):70-79.
Andrew Ashfield & Peter De Bolla (eds.) (1996). The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy M. Costelloe (ed.) (2012). The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge University Press.
Malcolm Budd (1998). Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature Part III: The Sublime in Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (3):233-250.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2010). The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):528-531.
S. Shapshay (2013). Contemporary Environmental Aesthetics and the Neglect of the Sublime. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (2):181-198.
Added to index2012-03-01
Total downloads13 ( #95,562 of 722,937 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,937 )
How can I increase my downloads?