Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):151 - 183 (1996)
|Abstract||We collect together some misgivings about the logic R of relevant inplication, and then give support to a weak entailment logic DJd. The misgivings centre on some recent negative results concerning R, the conceptual vacuousness of relevant implication, and the treatment of classical logic. We then rectify this situation by introducing an entailment logic based on meaning containment, rather than meaning connection, which has a better relationship with classical logic. Soundness and completeness results are proved for DJd with respect to a content semantics, which embraces the concept of meaning containment.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Francesco Paoli (2007). Implicational Paradoxes and the Meaning of Logical Constants. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):553 – 579.
André Fuhrmann & Edwin D. Mares (1994). On S. Studia Logica 53 (1):75 - 91.
Philip Kremer (1989). Relevant Predication: Grammatical Characterisations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (4):349 - 382.
Jonathan P. Seldin (2000). On the Role of Implication in Formal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1076-1114.
Vladimir L. Vasyukov (2011). Paraconsistency in Categories: Case of Relevance Logic. Studia Logica 98 (3):429-443.
Kazimierz Swirydowicz (1999). There Exist Exactly Two Maximal Strictly Relevant Extensions of the Relevant Logic R. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1125-1154.
Ross Thomas Brady (forthcoming). Free Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic.
Edwin David Mares (2004). Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation. Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Ryo Kashima & Norihiro Kamide (1999). Substructural Implicational Logics Including the Relevant Logic E. Studia Logica 63 (2):181-212.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #64,310 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?