David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):84-104 (2011)
Considering the enormous outpouring of scholarly work on Schmitt over the last two decades, the absence of an adequate treatment in English of Schmitt's concept of history and the problem of secularization is quite surprising. After all, it is Schmitt himself who claims that “all human beings who plan and attempt to unite the masses behind their plans engage in some form of philosophy of history,” such that the attempt to make sense of Schmitt's program remains incomplete without a serious treatment of his philosophy of history. This article is an attempt to address this problem by means of his exchange with Hans Blumenberg who, more than any other critic of Schmitt, was privy to the political intentions behind Schmitt's metaphorical use of theology. While their discussion is extensive and wide-ranging, I focus here on their diverging philosophies of history, precisely that aspect that is most relevant to gaining a more expansive understanding of Schmitt's arguments, and indeed the relationship between political thought and historical thought
|Keywords||secularization political theology Carl Schmitt Hans Blumenberg|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Heinrich Meier (1998). The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction Between Political Theology and Political Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Matthias Lievens (2011). Singularity and Repetition in Carl Schmitts Vision of History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):105-129.
Jeffrey Seitzer (2001). Comparative History and Legal Theory: Carl Schmitt in the First German Democracy. Greenwood Press.
M. Lievens (2010). Carl Schmitt's Two Concepts of Humanity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (8):917-934.
Carl Schmitt (1996/2008). The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol. University of Chicago Press.
Rafał Wonicki (2008). Politics of Power and Freedom in the Thought of Schmitt and Arendt. In Svetozar Minkov & Piotr Nowak (eds.), Man and His Enemies: Essays on Carl Schmitt.
Roman Altshuler (2009). Political Realism and Political Idealism: The Difference That Evil Makes. Public Reason 1 (2):73-87.
Kathrin Braun (2012). From the Body of Christ to Racial Homogeneity: Carl Schmitt's Mobilization of 'Life' Against 'the Spirit of Technicity'. The European Legacy 17 (1):1 - 17.
Michael Salter (2013). Carl Schmitt on the Secularisation of Religious Texts as a Resacralisation of Jurisprudence? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):113-147.
John P. McCormick (1997). Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge University Press.
Andrew Johnson, Viral Politics: Jacques Derrida's Account of the Auto-Immune Logic of Carl Schmitt's Political Philosophy.
Added to index2011-03-19
Total downloads48 ( #41,802 of 1,681,623 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #48,357 of 1,681,623 )
How can I increase my downloads?