Graduate studies at Western
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4):573-601 (2009)
|Abstract||The objective in the present paper is to analyze the aspect of subjectivity having to do with construing motion and change where no motion and change exists outside the representation, that is, in cases where the conceptualizer does not intend to convey the idea that these properties exist in the state of affairs described. In the process of doing so, I will elaborate on a critique of the notion of fictivity as it is currently being used in cognitive linguistics.|
|Keywords||Subjective motion Subjective change Fictivity Fictive motion Semantic meaning Enactment Virtuality Subjecthood Construal|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Aletta J. Norval (2006). Democratic Identification: A Wittgensteinian Approach. Political Theory 34 (2):229 - 255.
Milic Capek (1979). Two Views of Motion: Change of Position or Change of Quality? The Review of Metaphysics 33 (2):337 - 346.
Nancy J. Nersessian (1989). Conceptual Change in Science and in Science Education. Synthese 80 (1):163 - 183.
Trevor Ponech (2006). External Realism About Cinematic Motion. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):349-368.
Jan Westerhoff (2008). Nāgārjuna's Arguments on Motion Revisited. Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (4):455-479.
Oded Balaban (1995). The Modern Misunderstanding of Aristotle's Theory of Motion. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (1):1 - 10.
Thomas McLaughlin (2004). Local Motion and the Principle of Inertia. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):239-264.
Jacob Rosen (2012). Motion and Change in Aristotles Physics 5. 1. Phronesis 57 (1):63-99.
Added to index2009-03-09
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?