Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. An Inaugural Lecture Delivered in Cambridge on 2 December 1954
Graduate studies at Western
Cambridge [Eng.]University Press (1955)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Fairness Games of strategy (Mathematics|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Giovanni Facchini, Freek van Megen, Peter Borm & Stef Tijs (1997). Congestion Models and Weighted Bayesian Potential Games. Theory and Decision 42 (2):193-206.
John Immerwahr (1976). The Hobbes Game. Teaching Philosophy 1 (4):9-13.
André Casajus (2011). Differential Marginality, van den Brink Fairness, and the Shapley Value. Theory and Decision 71 (2):163-174.
Johan Van Benthem (2003). Logic Games Are Complete for Game Logics. Studia Logica 75 (2):183 - 203.
Johan van Benthem (2003). Logic Games Are Complete for Game Logics. Studia Logica 75 (2):183-203.
R. L. Goodstein (1951). The Foundations of Mathematics: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered at the University College of Leicester, 13th November 1951. University College.
Ernan McMullin (1956). Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. Philosophical Studies 6:193-197.
A. R. A. (1956). Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. The Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):516-516.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-09-15
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?