Three separable tests: Reply to professors Ginsberg and Margolis

World Futures 9 (1):140-147 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indiscernibility and perception: A reply to Joseph Margolis.Arthur C. Danto - 1999 - British Journal of Aesthetics 39 (4):321-329.
Reply to Hawthorne.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2).
Reply to Professors Martin and Rosenberg.Roland Puccetti - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):139 - 141.
III. A reply to Margolis.Charles Taylor - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):124-128.
A reply to professor Margolis.Roland Puccetti - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):281-285.
The Radical Nature of Margolis’ Relativism.B. Richard Beatch - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:81-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-01

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references