In David Estlund (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
|Abstract||The central question animating liberal thought is: How can people live together as free and equal? This question is being reinvigorated by the emergence of what we will call neoclassical liberalism. Neoclassical liberals, such as David Schmidtz, Gerald Gaus, Charles Griswold, Jacob Levy, Matt Zwolinski, Will Wilkinson, and we, the authors, share classical liberalism’s commitment to robust economic liberties and property rights as well as modern or “high” liberalism’s commitment to social justice. On the neoclassical liberal view, part of the justification for a society’s basic structure is that it produces conditions where citizens have substantive liberty, and can thus confront each other as free and equal. The basic structure of society is evaluable on the kinds of outcomes produced for citizens. Neoclassical liberals combine a robust commitment to social justice—a commitment as robust as that of high liberals—with a commitment to more extensive set of basic liberties than that advocated by high liberals. Neoclassical liberalism thus stakes out a claim to be the morally ambitious form of liberalism.|
|Keywords||liberalism social justice economic liberties|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Percy B. Lehning (1998). The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
William Glod (2010). Political Liberalism, Basic Liberties, and Legal Paternalism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):177-196.
John Tomasi (2012). Democratic Legitimacy and Economic Liberty. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):50-80.
Kevin Vallier (2011). Liberalism, Religion And Integrity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149 - 165.
João Cardoso Rosas (2006). Justice and Restrain. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
Stephen de Wijze (1999). South Africa and the Prospect of Political Liberalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):48-80.
Michael Sandel (2003). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Carol Hay (2012). Consonances Between Liberalism and Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (2):141-168.
Gerald Gaus & Kevin Vallier (2009). The Roles of Religious Conviction in a Publicly Justified Polity: The Implications of Convergence, Asymmetry and Political Institutions. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (1-2):51-76.
Ruth Abbey (2007). Back Toward a Comprehensive Liberalism? Justice as Fairness, Gender, and Families. Political Theory 35 (1):5 - 28.
Alan Ryan (2007). Newer Than What? Older Than What? Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):1-15.
Jonathan Jacobs (2011). Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
Enzo Rossi (forthcoming). Legitimacy, Democracy and Public Justification: Rawls’ Political Liberalism Vs Gaus’ Justificatory Liberalism. Res Publica.
Blain Neufeld & Chad Schoelandt (forthcoming). Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality. Law and Philosophy:1-30.
Blain Neufeld (2005). Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
Added to index2010-11-16
Total downloads71 ( #11,937 of 549,006 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,082 of 549,006 )
How can I increase my downloads?