Google, human rights, and moral compromise
Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):453 - 478 (2009)
| Abstract | International business faces a host of difficult moral conflicts. It is tempting to think that these conflicts can be morally resolved if we gained full knowledge of the situations, were rational enough, and were sufficiently objective. This paper explores the view that there are situations in which people in business must confront the possibility that they must compromise some of their important principles or values in order to protect other ones. One particularly interesting case that captures this kind of situation is that of Google and its operations in China. In this paper, I examine the situation Google faces as part of the larger issue of moral compromise and integrity in business. Though I look at Google, this paper is just as much about the underlying or background views Google faces that are at work in business ethics. In the process, I argue the following: First, the framework Google has used to respond to criticisms of its actions does not successfully or obviously address the important ethical issues it faces. Second, an alternative ethical account can be presented that better addresses these ethical and human rights questions. However, this different framework brings the issue of moral compromise to the fore. This is an approach filled with dangers, particularly since it is widely held that one ought never to compromise one’s moral principles. Nevertheless, I wish to propose that there may be a place for moral compromise in business under certain conditions, which I attempt to specify. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. Brooke Hamilton, Stephen B. Knouse & Vanessa Hill (2009). Google in China: A Manager-Friendly Heuristic Model for Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflicts. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):143 - 157.
Denis G. Arnold (2010). Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):371-399.
Simon Căbulea May (2011). Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):581-602.
Anthony F. Beavers (2005). Searching for Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 28 (4):367-371.
Theo Van Willigenburg (2000). Moral Compromises, Moral Integrity and the Indeterminacy of Value Rankings. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):385 - 404.
Theo van Willigenburg (2000). Moral Compromises, Moral Integrity and the Indeterminacy of Value Rankings. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):385-404.
Gary Elijah Dann & Neil Haddow (2008). Just Doing Business or Doing Just Business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! And the Business of Censoring China's Internet. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):219 - 234.
Gerald R. Winslow (1991). Integrity and Compromise in Nursing Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Jerry D. Goodstein (2000). Moral Compromise and Personal Integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):805-819.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads91 ( #7,525 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
