David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):271-281 (2013)
In Why Not Socialism ?, G. A. Cohen argues that market society and capitalism are intrinsically repugnant. He asks us to imagine an ideal camping trip, which becomes increasing repugnant as it shifts from living by socialist to capitalist principles. In this paper, I expose the limits of this style of argument by making a parallel argument, which shows how an ideal anarchist camping trip becomes increasingly repugnant as the campsite turns from anarchism to democracy. When we see why this style of argument fails to generate interesting objections to democracy, we then see why it also fails to generate interesting objections to market society.
|Keywords||G. A. Cohen Capitalism Socialism Greed Community|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gerald Gaus (2010). Coercion, Ownership, and the Redistributive State: Justificatory Liberalism's Classical Tilt. Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (01):233-.
Gregory S. Kavka (1995). Why Even Morally Perfect People Would Need Government. Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (01):1-18.
Sharon R. Krause (2010). Beyond Capitalism? [REVIEW] Political Theory 38 (6):884 - 890.
Charles Larmore (2013). What Is Political Philosophy? Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (3):276-306.
John Rawls (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2003). Egalitarianism and Repugnant Conclusions. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 38:115-125.
M. Ronzoni (2012). Life is Not a Camping Trip - on the Desirability of Cohenite Socialism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):171-185.
Michael Huemer (2008). In Defence of Repugnance. Mind 117 (468):899-933.
Douglas W. Portmore (1999). Does the Total Principle Have Any Repugnant Implications? Ratio 12 (1):80–98.
Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2006). On the Repugnance of the Repugnant Conclusion. Theoria 72 (2):126-137.
Stuart Rachels (2004). Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant but Forced Choice. In The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics.
Stuart Rachels (2004). Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice. In Jesper Ryberg Torbjorn Tannsjo (ed.), The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Jesper Ryberg (1996). Is the Repugnant Conclusion Repugnant? Philosophical Papers 25 (3):161-177.
Jesper Ryberg, Torbjörn Tännsjö & Gustaf Arrhenius (2006). The Repugnant Conclusion. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online; Last Accessed October 4:2006.
Rutger Claassen (2011). Communication as Commodity: Should the Media Be on the Market? Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):65-79.
Jesper Ryberg, The Repugnant Conclusion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stephen Grover (1999). Mere Addition and the Best of All Possible Worlds. Religious Studies 35 (2):173-190.
N. Scott Arnold (1992). Market Socialism. Critical Review 6 (4):517-557.
Added to index2012-02-28
Total downloads59 ( #40,635 of 1,700,311 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #47,237 of 1,700,311 )
How can I increase my downloads?