David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):1-27 (2012)
This paper concerns the question of whether the political liberties tend to be valuable to the people who hold them. Philosophers have argued that the political liberties are needed or at least useful to lead a full, human life, to have one's social status and the social bases of self-respect secured, to make the government responsive to one's interests and generate preferred political outcomes, to participate in the process of social construction so that one can feel at home in the social world, to live autonomously as a member of society, to achieve education and enlightenment and take a broad view of the world and of others' interests, and to express oneself and one's attitudes about the political process and current states of affairs. I argue that for most people, the political liberties are not valuable for these reasons
|Keywords||democratic theory political liberty republicanism civic humanism civic education|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Samuel Richard Freeman (2007). Rawls. Routledge.
John Tomasi (2012). Free Market Fairness. Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Jason Brennan (2012). For-Profit Business as Civic Virtue. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):313-324.
Robert E. Goodin & Ana Tanasoca (2014). Double Voting. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):743-758.
Dean J. Machin (2013). Political Inequality and the 'Super-Rich': Their Money or (Some of) Their Political Rights. Res Publica 19 (2):121-139.
Similar books and articles
Meena Krishnamurthy (2012). Reconceiving Rawls's Arguments for Equal Political Liberty and Its Fair Value. Social Theory and Practice 38 (2):258-278.
Steven Wall (2006). Rawls and the Status of Political Liberty. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):245–270.
Iseult Honohan (2002). Civic Republicanism. Routledge.
Patricia White (2012). Making Political Anger Possible: A Task for Civic Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):1-13.
John Tomasi (2012). Democratic Legitimacy and Economic Liberty. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):50-80.
Céline Spector (2003). Montesquieu: Critique of Republicanism? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):38-53.
Blain Neufeld & Gordon Davis (2010). Civic Respect, Civic Education, and the Family. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):94-111.
Robert Audi (1998). A Liberal Theory of Civic Virtue. Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (01):149-.
Ian Shapiro (1990). J. G. A. Pocock's Republicanism and Political Theory: A Critique and Reinterpretation. Critical Review 4 (3):433-471.
John Annette (2005). Character, Civic Renewal and Service Learning for Democratic Citizenship in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (3):326 - 340.
Simon Căbulea May (2011). Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):581-602.
N. Urbinati (2013). Sismonde de Sismondi's Aristocratic Republicanism. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):153-174.
Gordon Davis & Blain Neufeld (2007). Political Liberalism, Civic Education, and Educational Choice. Social Theory and Practice 33 (1):47-74.
Added to index2010-11-16
Total downloads78 ( #43,354 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #56,985 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?