Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):611-612 (1999)
|Abstract||The perceptual symbol approach to knowledge representation combines structured frames and dynamic imagery. The perceptual symbol approach provides a good account of the representation of scientific models, of some types of naive theories held by children and adults, and of certain reconstructive memory phenomena. The ontological status of perceptual symbols is unclear and this form of representation does not succeed in accounting for all forms of human knowledge.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nigel J. T. Thomas (2003). The False Dichotomy of Imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):211-211.
Ruediger Oehlmann (1999). Can Metacognition Be Explained in Terms of Perceptual Symbol Systems? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):629-630.
William F. Brewer (2001). Models in Science and Mental Models in Scientists and Nonscientists. Mind and Society 2 (2):33-48.
W. Martin Davies (2004). Amodal or Perceptual Symbol Systems: A False Dichotomy? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):162-163.
A. J. Wells (1999). External Symbols Are a Better Bet Than Perceptual Symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):634-635.
Xiang Chen (2001). Perceptual Symbols and Taxonomy Comparison. Philosophy of Science 3 (September):S200-S212.
Lawrence W. Barsalou (1999). Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):637-660.
Murat Aydede (1999). What Makes Perceptual Symbols Perceptual? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):610-611.
Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich (1999). Whither Structured Representation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):626-627.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #84,198 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?