Inquiry 46 (2):239 – 259 (2003)
|Abstract||Karl Ameriks has recently devoted an entire volume to defending what he calls "orthodox" Kantianism against what he judges to be the "errors" of such post-Kantian idealists as K. L. Reinhold and J. G. Fichte and to exposing what he claims is the frequently unnoticed but always deleterious influence of post-Kantianism upon certain prominent strands of contemporary philosophy. In response, this paper challenges Ameriks' interpretation of Kantianism itself and of the "post-Kantian project", as well as his construal of transcendental idealism. This is followed by some remarks concerning Reinhold's and Fichte's actual "arguments" for transcendental idealism and a rejection of Ameriks' characterizations of the same. Ameriks' interpretation of "the primacy of the practical" within Fichte's philosophy is also analyzed and criticized, as are his unsubstantiated claims concerning the powerful "indirect" influence of the writings of Reinhold and Fichte upon contemporary philosophy.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Karl Ameriks (1999). Idealism and Freedom. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):825-829.
Karl Ameriks (2004). Response to Ulrich Johannes Schneider. Teaching New Histories of Philosophy:297-305.
Karl Ameriks (2000). Kant's Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.
Karl Ameriks (1992). Kantian Idealism Today. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (3):329 - 342.
Karl Ameriks (2006). Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Karl Ameriks (2003). Interpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Kelley (2006). Review of Karl Leonhard Reinhold, Karl Ameriks (Ed.), James Hebbeler (Tr.), Letters on the Kantian Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (10).
Karl Ameriks (2003). On Being Neither Post- nor Anti-Kantian: A Reply to Breazeale and Larmore Concerning the Fate of Autonomy. Inquiry 46 (2):272 – 292.
Karl Ameriks (2000). Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,817 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,645 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?