The epistemic and informational requirements of utilitarianism
Utilitas 21 (1):72-99 (2009)
| Abstract | A recurring objection confronting utilitarianism is that its dictates require information that lies beyond the bounds of human epistemic wherewithal. Utilitarians require reliable knowledge of the social consequences of various policies, and of people’s preferences and utilities. Agreeing partway with the sceptics, I concur that the general rules-of-thumb offered by social science do not provide sufficient justification for the utilitarian legislator to rationally recommend a particular political regime, such as liberalism. Actual data about human preference-structures and utilities is required to bridge this evidentiary gap. I offer two arguments to support the availability of such information. First, I contend that ordinary human beings have a clear method of epistemic access to reliable information about commensurable preference-structures. Second, in an attempt to shift the onus of philosophic argument, I show that the utilitarian legislator’s requirements do not differ in kind from those implicitly called upon by the sceptical deontic liberal. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJesús Vega Encabo (2008). Epistemic Merit, Autonomy, and Testimony. Theoria 23 (1):45-56.
Alfred Mele (2011). Moral Responsibility for Actions: Epistemic and Freedom Conditions. Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):101-111.
Don Fallis (2004). Epistemic Value Theory and Information Ethics. Minds and Machines 14 (1):101-117.
Moritz Schulz (2010). Epistemic Modals and Informational Consequence. Synthese 174 (3).
By Adam Leite (2004). Is Fallibility an Epistemological Shortcoming? Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):232–251.
Suzanne Uniacke (2002). A Critique of the Preference Utilitarian Objection to Killing People. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (2):209 – 217.
Sven Ove Hansson (2007). Values in Pure and Applied Science. Foundations of Science 12 (3).
Steve Petersen (2013). Utilitarian Epistemology. Synthese 190 (6):1173-1184.
Steve Petersen (2013). Utilitarian Epistemology. Synthese 190 (6):1173-1184.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-02-05Total downloads30 ( #41,568 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
