Tuck on the Rationality of Voting: A Critical Note

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3):1-5 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that Richard Tuck, in his book Free Riding, fails to show it is rational to vote except in unusual cases.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suitable properties for any electronic voting system.Jean-Luc Koning & Didier Dubois - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (4):251-260.
Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote.Jason Brennan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):535-549.
The Ethics of Voting.Jason Brennan - 2011 - Princeton Univ Pr.
People Do Not Have a Duty to Avoid Voting Badly: Reply to Brennan.Marcus Arvan - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (1):1-6.
An argument for voting abstention.Nathan Hanna - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):279-286.
Hobbes: a very short introduction.Richard Tuck - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-10

Downloads
265 (#69,100)

6 months
4 (#315,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Brennan
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

Collective harm and the inefficacy problem.Julia Nefsky - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (4):e12587.
In defense of voting method publicity.Aylon Manor - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references