The Politics of the Personal: A Liberal Approach
Graduate studies at Western
American Political Science Review 101 (1):19-31 (2007)
|Abstract||Feminist thinkers have long criticized liberal theory’s public/private distinction for perpetuating indifference to injustices within the family. Thinkers such as Susan Okin have extended this criticism in evaluating the theory of political liberalism, suggesting that this theory’s reliance on a public conception of citizenship renders it indifferent to the way in which the internal politics of the family can undermine equality.However, I argue in this article that the feminist concern to ensure equality within the domestic sphere can in fact be incorporated into a reconstructed account of political liberalism. Central to my strong public reconstruction is the principle of publicly justifiable privacy, according to which the public/private distinction itselfmust be formulated with reference to the values of free and equal citizenship. On my account, the public values of citizenship should figure prominently in evaluations of family life. This reformulation of the public/private distinction answers feminist critics who suggest that political liberalism fails to offer a politics of the personal.|
|Keywords||Rawls Okin Basic Structure Family Gerry Cohen Justice contractualism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexandra Dobra (2011). OKIN's FEMINIST CHALLENGE TO RAWLS's THEORY OF JUSTICE. FROM THEORY TO PUBLIC ACTION. Studia Philosophia (1):51-64.
Alexandra Dobra (2011). OKIN's FEMINIST CHALLENGE TO RAWLS's THEORY OF JUSTICE. FROM THEORY TO PUBLIC ACTION. Studia UBB Philosophia (1):52-64.
Amy R. Baehr (1996). Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas. Hypatia 11 (1):49 - 66.
Blain Neufeld (2009). Coercion, the Basic Structure, and the Family. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.
Sandra Berns (2005). Liberalism and the Privatised Family: The Legacy of Rousseau. Res Publica 11 (2):125-155.
Susan Moller Okin (2005). ‘Forty Acres and a Mule’ for Women: Rawls and Feminism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (2):233-248.
Ruth Abbey (2007). Back Toward a Comprehensive Liberalism? Justice as Fairness, Gender, and Families. Political Theory 35 (1):5 - 28.
Debra Satz & Rob Reich (eds.) (2009). Toward a Humanist Justice: The Political Philosophy of Susan Moller Okin. OUP USA.
Blain Neufeld & Chad Schoelandt (forthcoming). Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality. Law and Philosophy:1-30.
Stephen De Wijze (2000). The Family and Political Justice: The Case for Political Liberalisms. Journal of Ethics 4 (3):257 - 281.
Brian Penrose (2000). Must the Family Be Just? Philosophical Papers 29 (3):189-221.
Cheshire Calhoun (2002). Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement. OUP Oxford.
Enzo Rossi (2013). Legitimacy, Democracy and Public Justification: Rawls' Political Liberalism Versus Gaus' Justificatory Liberalism. Res Publica:1-17.
Blain Neufeld (2005). Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
Elizabeth Brake (2004). Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):293-309.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-23
Total downloads1 ( #294,156 of 751,702 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 751,702 )
How can I increase my downloads?