Educational equality versus educational adequacy: A critique of Anderson and Satz

Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):117-128 (2009)
Abstract
Some theorists argue that rather than advocating a principle of educational equality as a component of a theory of justice in education, egalitarians should adopt a principle of educational adequacy. This paper looks at two recent attempts to show that adequacy, not equality, constitutes justice in education. It responds to the criticisms of equality by claiming that they are either unsuccessful or merely show that other values are also important, not that equality is not important. It also argues that a principle of educational adequacy cannot be all there is to justice in education.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Harry Brighouse, Educational equality versus educational adequacy: A critique of Anderson and Satz
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Shlomi Segall (2011). If You're a Luck Egalitarian, How Come You Read Bedtime Stories to Your Children? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (1):23-40.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-04-16

Total downloads

274 ( #1,151 of 1,096,253 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

73 ( #636 of 1,096,253 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.