Graduate studies at Western
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (2):111-123 (2003)
|Abstract||We generalize the Kolmogorov axioms for probability calculus to obtain conditions defining, for any given logic, a class of probability functions relative to that logic, coinciding with the standard probability functions in the special case of classical logic but allowing consideration of other classes of "essentially Kolmogorovian" probability functions relative to other logics. We take a broad view of the Bayesian approach as dictating inter alia that from the perspective of a given logic, rational degrees of belief are those representable by probability functions from the class appropriate to that logic. Classical Bayesianism, which fixes the logic as classical logic, is only one version of this general approach. Another, which we call Intuitionistic Bayesianism, selects intuitionistic logic as the preferred logic and the associated class of probability functions as the right class of candidate representions of epistemic states (rational allocations of degrees of belief). Various objections to classical Bayesianism are, we argue, best met by passing to intuitionistic Bayesianism—in which the probability functions are taken relative to intuitionistic logic—rather than by adopting a radically non-Kolmogorovian, for example, nonadditive, conception of (or substitute for) probability functions, in spite of the popularity of the latter response among those who have raised these objections. The interest of intuitionistic Bayesianism is further enhanced by the availability of a Dutch Book argument justifying the selection of intuitionistic probability functions as guides to rational betting behavior when due consideration is paid to the fact that bets are settled only when/if the outcome bet on becomes known|
|Keywords||probability intuitionistic logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Roeper & Hugues Leblanc (1999). Absolute Probability Functions for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (3):223-234.
C. J. Nix & J. B. Paris (2007). A Note on Binary Inductive Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):735 - 771.
Kenny Easwaran (2011). Bayesianism I: Introduction and Arguments in Favor. Philosophy Compass 6 (5):312-320.
Richard Dietz (2010). On Generalizing Kolmogorov. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):323-335.
Theodore Hailperin (2008). Probability Logic and Borel's Denumerable Probability. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (3):307-307.
Patrick Maher (2000). Probabilities for Two Properties. Erkenntnis 52 (1):63-91.
Torben Braüner (2006). Axioms for Classical, Intuitionistic, and Paraconsistent Hybrid Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):179-194.
Vieri Benci, Leon Horsten & Sylvia Wenmackers (2013). Non-Archimedean Probability. Milan Journal of Mathematics 81 (1):121-151.
Stefano Berardi (1999). Intuitionistic Completeness for First Order Classical Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):304-312.
Greg Restall (1997). Combining Possibilities and Negations. Studia Logica 59 (1):121-141.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads15 ( #85,981 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?