Human agency and the ideal of Shang Tong (upward conformity) in early mohist writings
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (3):409–425 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJane Geaney (1999). A Critique of A.C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons". Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Ian Johnston (2004). The Gongsun Longzi: A Translation and an Analysis of its Relationship to Later Mohist Writings. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (2):271–295.
Chris Fraser, More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.
Kevin James Spears Zollman (2010). Social Structure and the Effects of Conformity. Synthese 172 (3).
Erica Brindley (2009). “Why Use an Ox-Cleaver to Carve a Chicken?” The Sociology of the Junzi Ideal in the Lunyu. Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 47-70.
Yang Shang (1928). The Book of Lord Shang. London, A. Probsthain.
James D. Sellmann (2006). On the Origin of Shang and Zhou Law. Asian Philosophy 16 (1):49 – 64.
Jeffrey L. Richey (2011). Individualism in Early China: Human Agency and the Self in Thought and Politics – By Erica Fox Brindley. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (3):495-498.
Chris Fraser, Mohist Canons. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,498 of 549,017 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,017 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
