Identifying the optimal response is not a necessary step toward explaining function
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):85-86 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJonathan Riley (2006). Liberal Rights in a Pareto-Optimal Code. Utilitas 18 (1):61-79.
Christopher Nathan (2011). Need There Be a Defence of Equality? Winner of the 2010 Postgraduate Essay Prize. Res Publica 17 (3):211-225.
Laurence B. McCullough & Carol M. Ashton (1994). A Methodology for Teaching Ethics in the Clinical Setting: A Clinical Handbook for Medical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1).
Richard J. Hall (1990). Does Representational Content Arise From Biological Function? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:193 - 199.
John Broome (2009). Motivation. Theoria 75 (2):79-99.
Mareike B. Wieth & Rose T. Zacks (2011). Time of Day Effects on Problem Solving: When the Non-Optimal is Optimal. Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):387 - 401.
Jun Zhang, Trey Hedden & Adrian Chia (2012). Perspective-Taking and Depth of Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Sequential-Move Games. Cognitive Science 36 (3):560-573.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-02-13Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
