On building robot persons: Response to Zlatev [Book Review]
Minds and Machines 14 (3):381-385 (2004)
|Abstract||Zlatev offers surprisingly weak reasoning in support of his view that robots with the right kind of developmental histories can have meaning. We ought nonetheless to praise Zlatev for an impressionistic account of how attending to the psychology of human development can help us build robots that appear to have intentionality|
|Keywords||Intentionality Meaning Robot Science Zlatev, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Patrizia Marti (2010). Robot Companions: Towards a New Concept of Friendship? Interaction Studies 11 (2):220-226.
Stephen Petersen (2007). The Ethics of Robot Servitude. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 19 (1):43-54.
Robert Sparrow (2002). The March of the Robot Dogs. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (4):305-318.
C. T. A. Schmidt & F. Kraemer (2006). Robots, Dennett and the Autonomous: A Terminological Investigation. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 16 (1):73-80.
Anthony F. Beavers, Between Angels and Animals: The Question of Robot Ethics, or is Kantian Moral Agency Desirable?
Christopher Grau (2011). There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised). In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Donald Levy (2003). How to Psychoanalyze a Robot: Unconscious Cognition and the Evolution of Intentionality. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 13 (2):203-212.
Jordan Zlatev (2001). The Epigenesis of Meaning in Human Beings, and Possibly in Robots. Minds and Machines 11 (2):155-195.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,802 of 722,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?