Graduate studies at Western
Cognitive Science 34 (8):1530-1542 (2010)
|Abstract||Mark Changizi et al. (2008) claim that it is possible systematically to organize more than 50 kinds of illusions in a 7 × 4 matrix of 28 classes. This systematization, they further maintain, can be explained by the operation of a single visual processing latency correction mechanism that they call “perceiving the present” (PTP). This brief report raises some concerns about the way a number of illusions are classified by the proposed systematization. It also poses two general problems—one empirical and one conceptual—for the PTP approach|
|Keywords||Illusions latency correction sensorimotor contingencies visual perception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1978). High Probability and Inductive Systematization. Journal of Philosophy 75 (12):737-739.
Terence Rajivan Edward (2011). Theory-Laden Experience and Illusions. Ethos 4 (2):58-67.
Stephen Dinan (2002). Towards the Transformation Age. World Futures 58 (1):33 – 43.
Nathan Rotenstreich (1972). Experience and its Systematization. The Hague,Nijhoff.
D. E. B. Pollard (1980). Cognitive Systematization. Philosophical Studies 27:394-396.
Jonathan Baron (2002). Rationality and Illusion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):252-253.
Nicholas Rescher (2000). Kant and the Reach of Reason: Studies in Kant's Theory of Rational Systematization. Cambridge University Press.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1973). Conceptual Enrichment, Theories and Inductive Systematization. Distributor, the Academic Bookstore.
Mark A. Changizi (2010). Response to Briscoe (2010). Cognitive Science 34 (8):1543-1547.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1972). Inductive Systematization: Definition and a Critical Survey. Synthese 25 (1-2):25 - 81.
Added to index2010-05-27
Total downloads192 ( #1,889 of 733,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #2,344 of 733,590 )
How can I increase my downloads?