Perceiving the Present: Systematization of Illusions or Illusion of Systematization?

Cognitive Science 34 (8):1530-1542 (2010)
Mark Changizi et al. (2008) claim that it is possible systematically to organize more than 50 kinds of illusions in a 7 × 4 matrix of 28 classes. This systematization, they further maintain, can be explained by the operation of a single visual processing latency correction mechanism that they call “perceiving the present” (PTP). This brief report raises some concerns about the way a number of illusions are classified by the proposed systematization. It also poses two general problems—one empirical and one conceptual—for the PTP approach
Keywords Illusions  latency correction  sensorimotor contingencies  visual perception
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Robert Briscoe, Perceiving the Present: Systematization of Illusions or Illusion of Systematization?
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Julie M. Harris & Brian J. Rogers (1999). Going Against the Flow. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (12):449-450.

View all 11 references

Citations of this work BETA
Mark A. Changizi (2010). Response to Briscoe (2010). Cognitive Science 34 (8):1543-1547.
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

299 ( #2,002 of 1,699,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

31 ( #19,633 of 1,699,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.