'They Have to Show That They Can Make It': vitality as a criterion for the prognosis of premature infants
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nursing Ethics 7 (2):141-147 (2000)
In this article, the vitality of premature infants will be described and discussed. Vitality was one of the main factors in a grounded theory study in which the aim was to generate knowledge concerning the ethical decision-making processes with which nurses and physicians are faced in a neonatal unit. Which assessments underlie decisions about whether to start, continue or stop medical treatment of very sick premature babies? A descriptive study design, including 120 hours of field observations and 22 qualitative in-depth interviews with doctors and nurses, was chosen. Strauss and Glaser’s comparative method was used to analyse the field observations and interviews. The findings indicate that life-and-death decisions are somewhat ambivalent; experience does not always make them easier. In situations of ambiguity, decisions also seem to be based upon the vitality of the babies concerned
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. West (1988). Critical Issues in the Early Development of Premature Infants. Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (4):213-213.
Alexander Brink & Johannes Eurich (2006). Recognition Based Upon the Vitality Criterion: A Key to Sustainable Economic Success. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):155 - 164.
Paul Whitney & Desiree Budd (1999). A Separate Language-Interpretation Resource: Premature Fractionation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):113-113.
Tadeusz Skalski (2003). Doskonała teoria profesora Prognozy. Filozofia Nauki 1.
Thomas Pradeu & Edgardo D. Carosella (2006). On the Definition of a Criterion of Immunogenicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (47):17858--17861.
Claudia Wiesemann (1998). The Significance of Prognosis for a Theory of Medical Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):253-261.
Jon Williamson (2006). Combining Argumentation and Bayesian Nets for Breast Cancer Prognosis. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):155-178.
Jørgen Hilden & J. Dik F. Habbema (1987). Prognosis in Medicine: An Analysis of its Meaning and Rôles. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Gary Duhon (2008). An Uncomfortable Refusal Pp. 15-15 HTML Version | PDF Version (78k) Subject Headings: Premature Infants -- Medical Care -- Moral and Ethical Aspects. Commentary. [REVIEW] Hastings Center Report 38 (5):pp. 15-16.
Matt Williams & Jon Williamson (2006). Combining Argumentation and Bayesian Nets for Breast Cancer Prognosis. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):155-178.
Daniel N. Stern (2010). Forms of Vitality: Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology, the Arts, Psychotherapy, and Development. OUP Oxford.
Stephen Hetherington (2013). Where is the Harm in Dying Prematurely? An Epicurean Answer. Journal of Ethics 17 (1-2):79-97.
Frank Keil (2008). Biases Towards Internal Features in Infants' Reasoning About Objects. Cognition 107 (2):420-432.
Dominick A. Rizzi (1993). Medical Prognosis — Some Fundamentals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (4).
Brooke Alan Trisel (2007). What is a Premature Death? Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 11:54-82.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads1 ( #445,994 of 1,102,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?