David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Biology 38 (3):571–608. (2005)
Peculiar to Konrad Lorenz’s view of instinctive behavior is his strong innate-learned dichotomy. He claimed that there are neither ontogenetic nor phylogenetic transitions between instinctive and experience-based behavior components, thus contradicting all former accounts of instinct. The present study discusses how Lorenz came to hold this controversial position by examining the history of Lorenz’s early theoretical development in the crucial period from 1931 to 1937, taking relevant influences into account. Lorenz’s intellectual development is viewed as being guided by four theoretical and practical commitments as to how to study and explain behavior. These four factors, which were part of the general approach of Lorenz but not of other animal psychologists, were crucial in bringing about his specific position on instinctive behavior
|Keywords||Konrad Lorenz ethology instinct innateness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jean-Sébastien Bolduc (2012). Behavioural Ecology's Ethological Roots. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):674-683.
Similar books and articles
Ingo Brigandt (2005). The Early Theoretical Development of Konrad Lorenz and the Motivating Factors Behind His Instinct Concept [La Prima Fase Dello Sviluppo Teorico di Konrad Lorenz E I Fattori Motivanti Del Suo Concetto di Istinto]. In M. Celentano & M. Stanzione (eds.), Konrad Lorenz cent'anni dopo: L'eredità scientifica del padre dell'etologia.
Paul E. Griffiths (2004). Instinct in the '50s: The British Reception of Konrad Lorenz's Theory of Instinctive Behavior. Biology and Philosophy 19 (4):609-631.
Robert J. Richards (1974). The Innate and the Learned: The Evolution of Konrad Lorenz's Theory of Instinct. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4 (2):111-133.
Ingo Brigandt (2003). Gestalt Experiments and Inductive Observations: Konrad Lorenz's Early Epistemological Writings and the Methods of Classical Ethology. Evolution and Cognition 9:157–170.
Andre Ariew (1999). Innateness is Canalization: In Defense of a Developmental Account of Innateness. In , [Book Chapter] (in Press). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S19-S27.
Carlo Brentari (2009). Konrad Lorenz's Epistemological Criticism Towards Jakob von Uexküll. Sign Systems Studies 37 (3-4):637-659.
Ralf-Peter Behrendt (2006). The Desire to Obtain Money: A Culturally Ritualised Expression of the Aggressive Instinct. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):178-179.
Simon M. Huttegger (2007). Robustness in Signaling Games. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):839-847.
Christiane Weinberger (1980). Wissenschaftstheoretische Anmerkungen zu Konrad Lorenz' „Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung“. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 11 (1):147-161.
Felicia E. Kruse (forthcoming). Konrad Lorenz. Semiotics:589-599.
D. T. Wieck (1968). The Violence of Man Remarks On Konrad Lorenz: On Aggression. Diogenes 16 (62):103-123.
Søren Brier (2002). Intrasemiotics and Cybersemiotics. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):113-127.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads17 ( #94,089 of 1,096,842 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #164,128 of 1,096,842 )
How can I increase my downloads?