David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nursing Ethics 6 (2):137-143 (1999)
The aim of this study was to generate knowledge about how parents who have been part of an ethical decision-making process concerning a son or daughter in a neonatal unit experience life with a severely disabled child. A descriptive study design was chosen using 30 hours of field observations and seven in-depth interviews, carried out over a period of five months with parents who had been faced with ethical decisions concerning their own children in a neonatal unit. Strauss and Glaser’s constant comparative method was used for the analysis. The findings seem to indicate that these parents have an extremely tough life. Their relationships with their children are somewhat ambivalent. The children are very dependent on their parents, who in some ways both love and hate them. Too little rest and sleep and feeding the children are the most serious problems. The parents require respite facilities. The home can seem like a prison, from which it is impossible to escape. It is like having a baby who never grows up
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hyunseop Kim (2013). The Uncomfortable Truth About Wrongful Life Cases. Philosophical Studies 164 (3):623-641.
Ezio Di Nucci (2011). Sexual Rights and Disability. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (3):158-161.
A. Slowther (2008). Clinical Ethics Committee Case 3: Should Parents Be Able to Request Non-Therapeutic Treatment for Their Severely Disabled Child? Clinical Ethics 3 (3):109-112.
Eric B. Schmidt (2007). Making Someone Child-Sized Forever? Ethical Considerations in Inhibiting the Growth of a Developmentally Disabled Child. Clinical Ethics 2 (1):46-49.
Logi Gunnarsson (2008). The Great Apes and the Severely Disabled: Moral Status and Thick Evaluative Concepts. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):305 - 326.
David B. Resnik & Darryl C. Zeldin (2008). Environmental Health Research on Hazards in the Home and the Duty to Warn. Bioethics 22 (4):209–217.
Cynthia A. Stark (2007). How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (2):127–145.
Henry S. Richardson (2006). Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the Severely Disabled. Journal of Ethics 10 (4):419 - 462.
Claire Bernice Deason, Unexpected Consequences: The Constitutional Implications of Federal Prison Policy for Offenders Considering Abortion.
Mary Jane Treacy (1996). Double Binds: Latin American Women's Prison Memories. Hypatia 11 (4):130 - 145.
Rosalind Ekman Ladd (2004). The Child as Living Donor: Parental Consent and Child Assent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):143-148.
Donald Ipperciel (2007). The Latimer Decision. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:251-256.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads13 ( #261,911 of 1,792,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,566 of 1,792,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?