David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 35 (1):89-97 (1999)
In this response to Stenmark's critique of my views on rational theology, I concentrate on his distinction between the epistemic and the practical goals of religion and between descriptive and normative rational theology. With regard to the first distinction, I grant that truth claims play an essential role in religious belief and that it is indeed the task of philosophy of religion to decide on the meaning and rationality of such claims. I argue, however, that since such claims are internally related to the practical context of religious belief, their meaning and rationally cannot be determined apart from this context as is done in the kind of rational theology which Stenmark calls 'scientific'. With regard to the second distinction, I reject Stenmark's view that philosophy of religion has a descriptive task with reference to religion, and hence also his claim that I have put forward a false description of 'the religious language game'
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pamela Anderson (2010). Pure Reason and Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: The Rational Striving in and for Truth. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):95-106.
Stuart Rachels (2009). On Three Alleged Theories of Rational Behavior. Utilitas 21 (4):506-520.
Mikael Stenmark (1998). The End of the Theism–Atheism Debate? A Response to Vincent Brümmer. Religious Studies 34 (3):261-280.
Michael H. Barnes (1997). Mikael Stenmark, Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life: A Critical Evaluation of Four Models of Rationality. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):190-192.
Mikael Stenmark (2004). Should Religion Shape Science? Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):334-352.
Chris L. Firestone (2009). Towards and New Kantian Theology: Theology at the Transcendental Boundaries of Reason. Ashgate.
Mikael Stenmark (1995). Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life. University of Notre Dame Press.
Immanuel Kant (1996). Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #195,012 of 1,101,939 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,569 of 1,101,939 )
How can I increase my downloads?