Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (1):67-118 (2012)
|Abstract||As has been obvious to anyone who has looked at them, there is a special relationship between the two earliest extant works on Sanskrit poetics: Bhāmaha’s Kāvyālaṃkāra (Ornamenting Poetry) and Daṇḍin’s Kāvyādarśa (The Mirror of Poetry). The two not only share an analytical framework and many aspects of their organization but also often employ the selfsame language and imagery when they are defining and exemplifying what is by and large a shared repertoire of literary devices. In addition, they also betray highly specific disagreements regarding the nature and aesthetic value of a set of literary phenomena. It has thus long been clear to Indologists that the two are in conversation with one another, but the nature of the conversation and its directionality have never been determined: Was Bhāmaha responding to Daṇḍin’s Kāvyādarśa ? Was Daṇḍin making a rejoinder to Bhāmaha’s Kāvyālaṃkāra ? Were the two authors contemporaries who directly interacted with one another? Or was their interaction indirect and mediated through other texts that are no longer extant? Determining the nature of the interrelations between the two authors and their texts may teach us a great deal about the origins of Sanskrit poetics, the direction in which it developed during its formative period, and the way in which some of the disagreements between Daṇḍin and Bhāmaha metamorphosed in later time. By reviewing existing scholarship, considering new evidence, and taking a fresh look at some of the passages that have long stood at the center of this debate, this article sets out to answer the question of the texts’ relationship and relative chronology.|
|Keywords||Bhāmaha Daṇḍin Alaṃkāraśāstra|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anne E. Monius (2000). The Many Lives of Daṇḍin: The Kāvyādarśa in Sanskrit and Tamil. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 4 (1):1-37.
K. Subrahmanian (1979). Bhamaha and Valéry on Poetry. British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3):274-274.
Susan Mendus (2003). The Magic in the Pronoun My. In Matt Matravers (ed.), Scanlon and Contractualism. Frank Cass.
R. Anitha (2010). Bhartrhari's Vākyapadīya: Its Linguistic and Literary Implications with Special Reference to Modern English Poetry. Sukr̥tīndra Oriental Research Institute.
Jeff Speaks (forthcoming). What Are Debates About Qualia Really About? Philosophical Studies:1-26.
Dennis J. Schmidt (2001). On the Significance of Nature for the Question of Ethics. Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):62-77.
D. A. Truncellito (2004). Running in Circles About Begging the Question. Argumentation 18 (3):325-329.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Contemplation and Hypotheses in Literature. Philosophical Frontiers 5 (1):73-83.
Yigal Bronner (2010). The Poetics of Ambivalence: Imagining and Unimagining the Political in Bilhaṇa's Vikramāṅkadevacarita. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (5):457-483.
Karen A. Krasny, Imagery, Affect, and the Embodied Mind: Implications for Reading and Responding to Literature.
Sweta Prajapati (1998). Influence of Nyāya Philosophy on Sanskrit Poetics. Paramamitra Prakashan.
Yigal Bronner (2002). What is New and What is Navya: Sanskrit Poetics on the Eve of Colonialism. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 30 (5):441-462.
Harry Collins, Andy Clark & Jeff Shrager (2008). Keeping the Collectivity in Mind? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):353-374.
Romi Nijhawan & Beena Khurana (2002). Motion, Space, and Mental Imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):203-204.
Added to index2012-02-07
Total downloads3 ( #213,434 of 730,103 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 730,103 )
How can I increase my downloads?